Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 28 January 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 42


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 28 JANUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
David Shaw
Jarrod Anthony McKenna
Leigh John Parker

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 28 January 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 42
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 42
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened for a directions hearing on 28 January 2020, involving three defendants: David Shaw, Jarrod Anthony McKenna, and Leigh John Parker. The court was presented with a criminal matter requiring initial procedural guidance and direction on the forthcoming steps in the trial process. The hearing took place in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Acting Justice Porter.

The central legal issues before the court revolved around establishing the procedural framework for the upcoming trial. This included determining the admissibility of certain evidence, scheduling of witness testimonies, and any pre-trial motions that might need to be addressed. The court had to ensure that both the prosecution and the defence were adequately prepared and that the trial would proceed in an orderly and efficient manner, in line with the principles of justice.

Acting Justice Porter addressed the procedural matters methodically, outlining the timeline for evidence submissions, witness lists, and any potential challenges to evidence. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to legal protocols and maintaining fairness throughout the trial process. After considering submissions from both parties, the court provided clear directions and scheduled further hearings to ensure that all legal and procedural aspects were adequately covered before the trial commenced. The final orders ensured that the trial would proceed as planned, with all parties fully apprised of the court's expectations and requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.