LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 2021
HOBART
PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Stephen James Williams
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Trial
MJD
4.15pm
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley Glen Morrison
4.15pm
For Directions Hearing
EEVCourt 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Frederick John Pfeiffer v Christopher John Crole and anor
For Directions Hearing
Page Seager Pty Ltd v Conmoto Group Pty Ltd and anor
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
The State of Tasmania v Duncan Cameron McPherson
For Directions Hearing
Anthony William Bennett v Ruth Allocca and anor
For Directions Hearing
Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd and ors
For R414 Directions Hearing
TasBuild Limited v Programmed Skilled Workforce Limited
For Hearing
A Pitt & Co Pty Ltd and anor v Simmons Wolfhagen Pty Limited T/as Simmons Wolfhagen Lawyers (a firm)
For Hearing
Darren Kingsley Tressider v Cranes Combined Pty Ltd
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Jayde Patrick Burling
For Trial
Natalie Maher
(Part heard)
4:00pm
For Sentence
Robyn Lee Brown
4:15pm
For Bail Application via video-link to Private Witness Room, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Stephen James Williams
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Patrick Kerry Ainslie
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 362
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved a bail application for Stephen James Williams, who was appearing via video-link. The application was heard by Justice Pearce in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. Williams was facing criminal charges, and the primary legal issue before the court was whether he should be granted bail pending the outcome of his trial.
The court considered various factors in its decision, including the nature and seriousness of the charges, the likelihood of Williams appearing in court if released on bail, and any other relevant circumstances that might impact the bail decision. Justice Pearce examined the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defence, as well as any character references or other mitigating factors. The court also took into account the potential impact on the community and any risk of reoffending if bail was granted.
After carefully considering all the relevant factors, Justice Pearce determined that the appropriate course of action was to grant bail to Stephen James Williams. The court set specific conditions for his release, including a requirement to reside at a specified address and to report to a police station on a regular basis. The decision was based on a balanced assessment of the evidence and the factors outlined in the Bail Act.
The final orders of the court included the granting of bail to Stephen James Williams, subject to the specified conditions. The case was adjourned to a later date for further proceedings, allowing both parties to prepare for the trial.
The court considered various factors in its decision, including the nature and seriousness of the charges, the likelihood of Williams appearing in court if released on bail, and any other relevant circumstances that might impact the bail decision. Justice Pearce examined the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defence, as well as any character references or other mitigating factors. The court also took into account the potential impact on the community and any risk of reoffending if bail was granted.
After carefully considering all the relevant factors, Justice Pearce determined that the appropriate course of action was to grant bail to Stephen James Williams. The court set specific conditions for his release, including a requirement to reside at a specified address and to report to a police station on a regular basis. The decision was based on a balanced assessment of the evidence and the factors outlined in the Bail Act.
The final orders of the court included the granting of bail to Stephen James Williams, subject to the specified conditions. The case was adjourned to a later date for further proceedings, allowing both parties to prepare for the trial.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.