Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Tuesday, 26 March 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 26 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Leigh Fewkes
(part-heard)

2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex

Dallas John Eaves

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Decision
Ashton Mitchell Gill

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
JSR
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Marcus Denis Mayne

4:15pm For Sentence
SAT

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
IBF

(Part-heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a criminal trial was heard by Justice Brett. The case involved a defendant named Ashton Mitchell Gill. The nature of the dispute was criminal in nature, with Gill facing charges that were not specified in the provided extract. The proceedings took place in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The central legal issues before the court involved interpreting and applying criminal law to the facts of the case, determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant, and, if found guilty, determining the appropriate sentence.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not fully detailed in the provided extract, but it is evident that the court had to consider the evidence presented, the applicable legal principles, and the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. The decision would have hinged on whether the prosecution successfully proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Given the partial hearing noted, it is likely that the case was still ongoing, and a full decision would be rendered at a later date.

If the court found Gill guilty, the final orders would include a formal finding of guilt, a sentencing hearing, and the imposition of a sentence appropriate to the offence committed. The specifics of the sentence would depend on various factors, including the nature of the crime, any mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the sentencing guidelines applicable under Tasmanian law.

Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Tuesday, 26 March 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established