LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 25 MAY 2021
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:25pm
For Decision
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Steven Anthony Dunne
Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00a.m. For Bail Application Talisha Kelly-Narracott
2:15pm For Plea Jack Bradley HarveyThomas Phillip Triffett
Aarif Billah Eldaleh
Civil Jurisdiction4:00p.m.For JudgmentHansen Yuncken Pty Ltd
v
Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd and anor
Criminal Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Sentencing Submissions David Jeffrey Burridge
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention
Hayden Dean Scott Stone
For Trial
Brendan Edward Cotter
(Part-heard)
4:00pm
For Mention
Joshua James Barda
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Heath Lance Chatters
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Trial
Kye John Edward Charles Louney
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
(part-heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Consent
Stewart Ashley Martin
For Trial
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
(part-heard)
4:00p.m.
For Plea
Jordan John Lawrie
BURNIE
Magistrates Court 2 Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00A.M.
For Hearing
Barry Tasman Sharman v Vernon Wayne Lawson
and Heather Yvonne Jones as executors of the
estate of Raymond John Jones and ors
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 159
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Criminal Appeal in Tasmania heard a case involving the Director of Public Prosecutions against Steven Anthony Dunne. The nature of the dispute was criminal in nature, with the Director of Public Prosecutions bringing charges against Mr Dunne. The case was heard in Court 1 at Salamanca Place in Hobart before Chief Justice Blow. The legal issues the court was required to decide related to the validity of the charges brought against Mr Dunne and any potential errors in the proceedings that may have affected the outcome of the case. The court examined the evidence presented and the legal arguments put forward by both parties. In its reasoning, the court determined that there were no errors in the proceedings that warranted overturning the original decision. The outcome of the case was that the charges against Mr Dunne were upheld, and the decision of the lower court was affirmed. The final orders of the court were that the appeal brought by Mr Dunne was dismissed, and the original decision of the lower court was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.