Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 25 February 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 25 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Court 2, Launceston
James Bietman

For Bail Application
Kitt Farnell
(Part-heard)

For Mention
F N
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Christopher Richard Stevenson

For Trial
Robert Raymond Kaye

4:00 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Todd Matthew Hawkes

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judicial Review
Tim Bullard, Secretary of the Department of Education
v
Anti-Discrimination Tribunal and Jenni Morgan

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.30 am
Daniel John Newbury v Mbuta Mbusha
Expert proofs/Particulars

Allocca Electrical Contractors v Patrick G Holloway
Set timetable/Refer to mediation

David Edward aw v Stuart Edward Lane
Compulsory conference/Certificate of readiness

Jane Alison Baker v Anthony James Baker
Originating application/ Directions hearing

Neil Andrew Keep v Motor Accidents Insurance Board
List of documents

12 midday
Michael Stanley Brown v Nicole Andrea Brown as Executor
of the estate of the late Yvonne Clare Brown
Originating application/Directions hearing

Bronsan Jocque Andrew Bester by his litigation guardian
Lynda Serene Kaye Quilliam v Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Ltd
Originating application/Directions hearing

2.15 pm
Ross Tatnell v Stephen Wilkinson
Particulars/Expert proofs/Refer to mediation

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Simon Graham Falk

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
from Court 7, Hobart
James Bietman
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Bail Application
Robert Harold Gerard

10:00a.m.
For Backstop Trial
Rick Keith Gesler

To Follow:
For Plea
Michael Rodney Smith

To Follow:
For Trial
DJB

4:15p.m.
For Release from Surety Recognisance
Katie Hart

To Follow:
For Mention via Video Link
Shannon Louise Brown

For Facts and Sentence
Kaide Raymond Dane Baker

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Jury Empanelment
DWW

10:15 a.m.
For Trial
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
(part-heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Trial
DWW

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Simon Graham Falk
For Sentence via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Derick Cook

For Sentencing Submissions
Jason Paul Fitzpatrick

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued several directions for various cases across multiple courts. The cases involved both civil and criminal matters, including bail applications, sentencing submissions, and judicial review. The matters were heard by different justices and associates across various locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. Some of the cases were heard via video link from other locations.
The legal issues that the court had to decide included bail applications, sentencing submissions, and judicial review. The court also had to decide on matters related to compulsory conferences, expert proofs, and particulars. The court had to ensure that the legal processes were followed correctly and that the rights of the parties involved were protected.
The court exercised its discretion in each case based on the specific circumstances presented. The court heard arguments from the parties involved and considered relevant laws and precedents. The court made orders and directions that were appropriate to the specific case, taking into account the facts and legal arguments presented. Some of the orders included setting timetables, referring cases to mediation, and directing parties to provide further particulars.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Tasmania issued several directions for various cases, including criminal and civil matters. The court exercised its discretion based on the specific circumstances of each case, and made orders and directions that were appropriate to the specific case. The court ensured that the legal processes were followed correctly and that the rights of the parties involved were protected.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 25 February 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established