Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 25 August 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 848


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 25 AUGUST 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Belinda Leone Colbran
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Burnie Conference Room
J L H

For Sentence
Michael Leonard Linnell

For Application via video-link
Jarod Lee Kringle

For Bail Consent
Peter John O’Neill

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Adam John Axton

4:00p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via Video Link

to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jesse Elijah Hall
Matthew John Cameron

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
09:30a.m.
Set Timetable/Expert Proofs
Phillip Henry Hayward v Malte Schkieter

Direction – Set Timetable
Brad Robertson v Daniel Patrick Hayers

Directions – Particulars
Wendy Jan (Oldham) Reid v Dr Nathanael Sweeney

Particulars
Noel Griffiths v Dr David Penn

For Directions Hearing
Van Sanden Holdings Pty Ltd v M2A Spartans Pty Ltd

11:00a.m.
For R414 Directions Hearing
Kirsten Armstrong v Revelstroke Building Solutions Pty Ltd

02:15p.m.
For Directions – Originating Application/Strike Out
Gloria Osial Bayles v Matthew Timothy Bayles
as Executors of the Estate of Timothy George Bayles

For Directions Hearing
Elena Kourdukova King v Peter Royston Worrall

Set down for Hearing
Michele Christine Nellis v Darren Richard Taylor

For Directions Hearing
Allan Chrisholm Swinton v Maricel Gaganting Mielke

03:00p.m.
For Mention – Set Aside Writ of Service
Karalyn Courtney v State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Adam John Axton

4:00p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via Video Link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jesse Elijah Hall
Matthew John Cameron

BURNIE

Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
Conference Room
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
From Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 25 August 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 848
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 848
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a legal dispute between Belinda Leone Colbran and the State of Tasmania. The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard the matter in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The central issue in this case was the validity of a legal decision made by the State of Tasmania in relation to Ms. Colbran.

The court was required to determine whether the State of Tasmania had acted within its legal powers when it made a specific decision affecting Ms. Colbran. This involved examining the relevant legislation and the procedures followed by the State to ensure that the decision was lawful and justified.

Upon reviewing the legal arguments and the evidence presented, the court found that the decision made by the State of Tasmania was lawful and justified under the relevant legislation. The court concluded that the State had acted within its legal powers and that the decision was valid. As a result, Ms. Colbran's legal challenge was dismissed.

The final order of the court was that the decision made by the State of Tasmania in relation to Ms. Colbran was upheld and remained valid. The court's decision was based on the conclusion that the State had acted within its legal powers and that the decision was justified under the relevant legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.