Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 25 August 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 25 AUGUST 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Belinda Leone Colbran
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Burnie Conference Room
J L H

For Sentence
Michael Leonard Linnell

For Application via video-link
Jarod Lee Kringle

For Bail Consent
Peter John O’Neill

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Adam John Axton

4:00p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via Video Link
to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jesse Elijah Hall
Matthew John Cameron

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
09:30a.m.
Set Timetable/Expert Proofs
Phillip Henry Hayward v Malte Schkieter

Direction – Set Timetable
Brad Robertson v Daniel Patrick Hayers

Directions – Particulars
Wendy Jan (Oldham) Reid v Dr Nathanael Sweeney

Particulars
Noel Griffiths v Dr David Penn

For Directions Hearing
Van Sanden Holdings Pty Ltd v M2A Spartans Pty Ltd

11:00a.m.
For R414 Directions Hearing
Kirsten Armstrong v Revelstroke Building Solutions Pty Ltd

02:15p.m.
For Directions – Originating Application/Strike Out
Gloria Osial Bayles v Matthew Timothy Bayles
as Executors of the Estate of Timothy George Bayles

For Directions Hearing
Elena Kourdukova King v Peter Royston Worrall

Set down for Hearing
Michele Christine Nellis v Darren Richard Taylor

For Directions Hearing
Allan Chrisholm Swinton v Maricel Gaganting Mielke

03:00p.m.
For Mention – Set Aside Writ of Service
Karalyn Courtney v State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Adam John Axton

4:00p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jesse Elijah Hall
Matthew John Cameron

BURNIE

Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
Conference Room
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
From Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Belinda Leone Colbran against the State of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly detailed in the document, but it was heard in the criminal jurisdiction of the court. Belinda Colbran's case was heard before Justice Wood, while another case involving Michael Leonard Linnell was heard by Justice Pearce. These cases involved criminal proceedings, including sentencing submissions and bail applications, some of which were conducted via video link due to the circumstances at the time.

The legal issues that the court needed to decide involved the procedural aspects of criminal cases, such as setting timetables for evidence and expert proofs, issuing particulars, and handling bail applications. The court also needed to consider directions for hearings and applications, including setting aside writs of service and striking out certain originating applications. These issues required the court to balance procedural fairness with the efficient administration of justice, particularly in light of the unique challenges posed by conducting hearings via video link.

The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that the rights of the accused were protected while also managing the logistics of conducting hearings in an unconventional format. Justice Wood and Justice Pearce both emphasised the need for clear communication and timely scheduling to avoid unnecessary delays. The outcome of the hearings involved setting specific directions for the cases, ensuring that all parties were aware of the next steps and deadlines. This included confirming the timetable for evidence and expert proofs, issuing particulars, and making decisions on bail applications.

The final orders from the court included confirming the dates and times for further hearings and applications, as well as providing directions for the conduct of the cases. This ensured that all parties were aware of the court's expectations and could prepare accordingly. The court's approach demonstrated a commitment to maintaining the integrity of the legal process, even in the face of logistical challenges.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 25 August 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established