LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 24 AUGUST 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Court of Criminal Appeal
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Dean Phillip Braslin
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm
For Directions Hearing via Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and ors
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m.
For Sentence
Cheryl Ann Kendall
09:30a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Marc Russell
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10 am
For Sentencing Submissions
John Charles Reardon
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Kara Michelle Browning v Stephen Fahan Dixon
11:00a.m.
For Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Albert Edward West and anor
12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Olyumpus Superannuation Fund v Recorder of Titles and anor
For Directions Hearing
Joanne Daly v Frances Mary Daly and anor
For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Michael Tusyn v Dinesh Loganathan
For Directions Hearing
Carleen Vera Hancock v Kenneth Hancock as Executor of the Estate of Erna Starosta
For Directions Hearing
Helen Marta Starosta and anor v Kenneth Hancock as Executor of the Estate of Erna Starosta
For Directions Hearing
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
Peter Nathan Bennett v Evans Accounting & Taxation Pty Ltd
For Directions Hearing
Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd and ors
For Directions Hearing
Moe Sultan v Aziz Gregory Melick and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm
For Directions Hearing via Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and ors
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 275
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on 24 August 2021. One case involved a directions hearing for Edward Harvey Gee against The University of Tasmania Foundation and others. The dispute centres on claims made by Gee against the university, including allegations of academic misconduct and defamation. The case was heard via directions hearing in Launceston before Justice Brett. Another case involved a bail application for Marc Russell, who appeared via video-link from Risdon Prison Complex. The application was heard before Acting Justice Porter, who made a decision on whether Russell should be granted bail. Further, the court heard a sentencing submission for John Charles Reardon before Associate Justice Holt. The court also dealt with several directions hearings, including cases involving Kara Michelle Browning, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Olyumpus Superannuation Fund, Joanne Daly, Nicholas Michael Tusyn, Carleen Vera Hancock, Helen Marta Starosta, Peter Nathan Bennett, Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd, and Moe Sultan.
The legal issues that the court had to decide varied depending on the case. For example, in the case of Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and others, the court had to determine the merits of the claims made by Gee against the university. In the case of Marc Russell, the court had to decide whether he should be granted bail or not. In the case of John Charles Reardon, the court had to consider the sentencing submissions made by the parties. In the directions hearings, the court had to decide whether the cases should proceed to trial or if there were any preliminary issues that needed to be resolved.
The court's reasoning and outcome differed depending on the case. For example, in the case of Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and others, the court made a decision on the directions hearing, which included determining the scope of discovery and the admissibility of certain evidence. In the case of Marc Russell, the court granted bail to the applicant. In the case of John Charles Reardon, the court considered the sentencing submissions made by the parties and made a decision on the appropriate sentence. In the directions hearings, the court made decisions on whether the cases should proceed to trial or if there were any preliminary issues that needed to be resolved.
Overall, the Supreme Court of Tasmania dealt with a range of cases on 24 August 2021, including directions hearings, bail applications, and sentencing submissions. The legal issues and outcomes differed depending on the case, but the court made decisions on the merits of the claims, the admissibility of evidence, and the appropriate sentence.
The legal issues that the court had to decide varied depending on the case. For example, in the case of Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and others, the court had to determine the merits of the claims made by Gee against the university. In the case of Marc Russell, the court had to decide whether he should be granted bail or not. In the case of John Charles Reardon, the court had to consider the sentencing submissions made by the parties. In the directions hearings, the court had to decide whether the cases should proceed to trial or if there were any preliminary issues that needed to be resolved.
The court's reasoning and outcome differed depending on the case. For example, in the case of Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and others, the court made a decision on the directions hearing, which included determining the scope of discovery and the admissibility of certain evidence. In the case of Marc Russell, the court granted bail to the applicant. In the case of John Charles Reardon, the court considered the sentencing submissions made by the parties and made a decision on the appropriate sentence. In the directions hearings, the court made decisions on whether the cases should proceed to trial or if there were any preliminary issues that needed to be resolved.
Overall, the Supreme Court of Tasmania dealt with a range of cases on 24 August 2021, including directions hearings, bail applications, and sentencing submissions. The legal issues and outcomes differed depending on the case, but the court made decisions on the merits of the claims, the admissibility of evidence, and the appropriate sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.