LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 22 JUNE 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Trial
Anthony Stephen Butcher
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Patrick Simon Bailey
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For directions hearing
Melinda Ann Berry
For disputed facts hearing
David Hau Moeakiola
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Mention
For R419 Directions Hearing
Tracy Lee BRANDIS-GRAY v Amanda YOUNG and anor
For Mention – Assessment of Damages
TINNING EARTHMOVING Pty Ltd v Danroc Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Rocdan Contracting
11:00a.m.
For R419 Directions Hearing
Kerrie Margaret EDWARDS v Scott FLETCHER and ors
12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Baocheng XING v THE RECORDER OF TITLES and anor
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Mention
Amelia Jane ROWE v Terrence ANDREWS and ors
For Mention
Liesbeth Henriette GARNHAM v Robert Russell ELLIS and anor
For Directions Hearing
Gerry ANDERSON and anor v RJ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES NO 2 PTY LTD (CAN 122 349 973) and ors
For Directions Hearing
Terri Marie McDOUGALL v Anton Jean-Pierre ROBERTS
For Directions Hearing
Nadine PARRY and anor v Anton Jean-Pierre ROBERTS
For Directions Hearing
Tim BULLARD (SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION) v TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION
For R416 Directions Hearing
PUBLIC TRUSTEE v WEBSTER and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Ruhua Liu
Shayne Michael Murphy
(part-heard)
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
Patrick Simon Bailey
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
David Allan Williams
Simon John Dennison
(Part-heard)
2:15pm
For Mention
Dean Fredrick Nichols
Alistair Paul Nicholls
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Danny John Ross Grieve
For Legal Argument
Liam Kerry Whitton-Lowe
For Application
Nicholas Kyle Jones
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Patrick Simon Bailey
For Mention
Gary Donald Gleeson
Garry John Clarke
For Bail Variation
Nathan Terrence Applebee
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 195
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of criminal matters on 22 June 2021. In the Hobart Court 1, the Court was before Justice Wood, and the case of Anthony Stephen Butcher was heard, albeit partially. In the Burnie Court 1 and Launceston Court 2, Justice Brett heard the case of Patrick Simon Bailey and conducted a sentencing hearing via video link. The case of Nathan Baden Roy Whelan was also mentioned via video link from Burnie Court 1, Launceston Court 2, and Risdon Prison Complex.
The primary legal issues in these cases would have involved the interpretation and application of criminal law, including evidence, sentencing, bail, and other procedural matters. In the case of Anthony Stephen Butcher, the partial hearing suggests that the trial was ongoing, and the court had to determine whether the evidence presented was sufficient to make a decision. In the case of Patrick Simon Bailey, the court had to determine the appropriate sentence based on the evidence presented during the trial. The case of Nathan Baden Roy Whelan required the court to consider whether to vary the bail conditions.
Justice Wood, Brett, and other judges involved in these cases applied the relevant criminal law principles and procedures to reach their decisions. The court considered the evidence presented and applied the law to the facts of each case. The outcome of each case would have depended on the specific circumstances and the evidence presented. The final orders would have been made by the court after considering all the relevant factors.
In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several criminal matters on 22 June 2021. The primary legal issues involved the interpretation and application of criminal law, including evidence, sentencing, bail, and procedural matters. The court considered the evidence presented and applied the law to the facts of each case to reach its decisions. The final orders would have been made by the court after considering all the relevant factors.
The primary legal issues in these cases would have involved the interpretation and application of criminal law, including evidence, sentencing, bail, and other procedural matters. In the case of Anthony Stephen Butcher, the partial hearing suggests that the trial was ongoing, and the court had to determine whether the evidence presented was sufficient to make a decision. In the case of Patrick Simon Bailey, the court had to determine the appropriate sentence based on the evidence presented during the trial. The case of Nathan Baden Roy Whelan required the court to consider whether to vary the bail conditions.
Justice Wood, Brett, and other judges involved in these cases applied the relevant criminal law principles and procedures to reach their decisions. The court considered the evidence presented and applied the law to the facts of each case. The outcome of each case would have depended on the specific circumstances and the evidence presented. The final orders would have been made by the court after considering all the relevant factors.
In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several criminal matters on 22 June 2021. The primary legal issues involved the interpretation and application of criminal law, including evidence, sentencing, bail, and procedural matters. The court considered the evidence presented and applied the law to the facts of each case to reach its decisions. The final orders would have been made by the court after considering all the relevant factors.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.