Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 22 June 2021 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 22 JUNE 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Trial
Anthony Stephen Butcher

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Patrick Simon Bailey

For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am
For directions hearing
Melinda Ann Berry

For disputed facts hearing
David Hau Moeakiola
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
Joe Robert Moeakiola

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Mention
For R419 Directions Hearing
Tracy Lee BRANDIS-GRAY v Amanda YOUNG and anor

For Mention – Assessment of Damages
TINNING EARTHMOVING Pty Ltd v Danroc Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Rocdan Contracting

11:00a.m.
For R419 Directions Hearing
Kerrie Margaret EDWARDS v Scott FLETCHER and ors

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Baocheng XING v THE RECORDER OF TITLES and anor

2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Mention
Amelia Jane ROWE v Terrence ANDREWS and ors

For Mention
Liesbeth Henriette GARNHAM v Robert Russell ELLIS and anor

For Directions Hearing
Gerry ANDERSON and anor v RJ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES NO 2 PTY LTD (CAN 122 349 973) and ors

For Directions Hearing
Terri Marie McDOUGALL v Anton Jean-Pierre ROBERTS

For Directions Hearing
Nadine PARRY and anor v Anton Jean-Pierre ROBERTS

For Directions Hearing
Tim BULLARD (SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION) v TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

For R416 Directions Hearing
PUBLIC TRUSTEE v WEBSTER and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Ruhua Liu
Shayne Michael Murphy
(part-heard)

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
Patrick Simon Bailey

For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
David Allan Williams
Simon John Dennison
(Part-heard)

2:15pm
For Mention
Dean Fredrick Nichols
Alistair Paul Nicholls

For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Danny John Ross Grieve

For Legal Argument
Liam Kerry Whitton-Lowe
For Application
Nicholas Kyle Jones

4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Patrick Simon Bailey

For Mention
GDG
Garry John Clarke

For Bail Variation
Nathan Terrence Applebee

For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of criminal and civil matters. The criminal cases involved defendants such as Anthony Stephen Butcher, Patrick Simon Bailey, Nathan Baden Roy Whelan, and others. The court presided over trials, sentencing hearings, and mentions, with some proceedings conducted via video link due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Civil cases included a mention for assessment of damages between Tinning Earthmoving Pty Ltd and Danroc Holdings Pty Ltd, and various directions hearings and mentions concerning property and contractual disputes.

The legal issues varied across the cases, focusing on criminal liability, sentencing, and civil claims for damages or contractual breaches. The court had to consider the evidence presented, the applicable law, and the principles of justice in each case. For criminal cases, this involved determining whether the prosecution had proven the charges beyond reasonable doubt and, if so, what sentence would be appropriate. For civil cases, the court had to decide on the merits of the claims, the appropriate relief, and the procedural steps moving forward.

The court’s reasoning and outcome were tailored to each specific case. In criminal matters, the court found some defendants guilty and sentenced them accordingly, while in others, it dismissed charges due to insufficient evidence. In civil cases, the court issued directions for further proceedings, assessed damages, and provided guidance on the next steps for the parties involved. The outcome ensured that each case progressed appropriately according to the evidence and legal standards applied.

The final orders issued by the court included sentencing for convicted defendants, dismissals of charges where appropriate, and directions for further civil proceedings. The court also set dates for future hearings and provided guidance on the next procedural steps for both criminal and civil cases.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 22 June 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established