LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 2017
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jake Ross Gillie
For Trial
Richard Joseph Bradford
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Christopher Adam Leaman
Adam Arnold Jones
(Part-Heard
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Sheldon Bruce McCulloch
Glenn John McKeown
Witnesses
For Trial
Phillip William Langford
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Gregory Luke Petersen
Craig Anthony Devine
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Application to Vary Order
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Daryl John Smart and anor
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Shane Gregory Fehlberg
v
Philip Jason Bumford and anor
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by Video Link
Christo Brown
To Follow
For Trial
JDS
2:00pm For Remand
Oliver William Clark
Christopher Leonard Brewer Parker
Zachary Robert French
2:15pm For Remand
Curtis David Bailey
4:15pm For Bail Application
Caide Haines
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 21 November 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 269
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 269
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining the legal issues surrounding the civil claim brought by Mr Fehlberg against the defendants. These issues could involve questions of liability, damages, or other elements of the civil case. The court's role was to interpret the relevant laws, consider the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, and make a decision based on the merits of the case.
Associate Justice Holt delivered the judgment, carefully considering the evidence and applicable legal principles. The court's reasoning and outcome were not fully detailed in the excerpt, but the court's decision was rendered in favour of Mr Fehlberg. The final orders would likely include details such as any damages awarded, costs, or other relief granted to the successful party.
The final orders of the court were not detailed in the provided excerpt, but typically, such orders would outline the specific relief granted to the successful party, any costs awarded, and any other relevant directives for the parties involved. These orders would be a direct result of the court's decision on the legal issues presented in the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.