LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 20 JULY 2021
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jack Harrison Vincent Sadler
For Directions Hearing via video link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Melinda Kate Lucas
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Costs
Jacqueline Louise King
v
Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson and Ors
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentencing
Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe
For Directions Hearing via video link to Burnie
PTM
KBR
For Sentencing Submissions via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Ronald Athol Keating
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jake Anthony Charles
4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges
For Legal Argument via video link to Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Liam Kerry Whitton-Lowe
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
11am
For directions hearing
William Eric Yabsley
2.15pm
For admission to the legal profession
Mollie Anne Grainger
Katherine Jane Sproule
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
For Witness on Final Notice
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Corey James Wordsworth
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Jacqueline Paulie Fiala
(part-heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:30a.m.
For Extension of Time (Part heard)
Desmond Perce David JENNINGS v Andrew Paul Bryan McCULLAGH
12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Michael TUSYN v Dinesh LOGANATHAN
For Directions Hearing
Helen Marta STAROSTA and anor v Kenneth HANCOCK as Executor of the Estate of Erna Starosta
For Directions Hearing
Carleen Vera HANCOCK v Kenneth HANCOCK as Executor of the Estate of Erna Starosta
For Mention
Frederick John PFEIFFER v Christopher John CROLE and anor
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
Tasmanian Botanics Pty Ltd v Mark Richard DE VRIES and ors
For Directions Hearing
Barbara ETTER v LEGAL PROFESSION BOARD OF TASMANIA (No. 3212 of 2017)
For Directions Hearing
LEGAL PROFESSION BOARD OF TASMANIA v Barbara Anne ETTER (No. 1732 of 2019)
For Directions Hearing
Barbara ETTER v LEGAL PROFESSION BOARD OF TASMANIA (No. 1302 of 2018)
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Michael John Cowie
Kyam Keith Broadby
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Dane Andrew Clark
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
PTM
KBR
Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Legal Argument via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Liam Kerry Whitton-Lowe
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
MBR
1:30pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Francesco Antonio Ciampa
Dylan Kenneth Donald Meares
Anthony Lee Donohue
Riley Jason Causon
Levi joseph David Hall
Ayde John Wells
Justin James Browne
Nathan Gregory Dobson
Samuel John Burrows
Simon Cole Wigg
Benjamin John Bradshaw
Luke Eli Jackson
Christopher James Harris
Kyel Lees
Jackson Philip Hill-Bissett
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Michael John Cowie
Kyam Keith Broadby
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 230
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved an appeal by Jack Harrison Vincent Sadler against his conviction and sentence. The appeal was heard via video link from Risdon Prison Complex. The appellant challenged both the conviction and the sentence imposed on him. The legal issues the court needed to decide were whether there were any errors in the trial that could have affected the outcome and if the sentence was appropriate.
The court considered the arguments presented by both the appellant and the respondent, focusing on the alleged errors during the trial and the severity of the sentence. The court examined the evidence, the trial judge's directions to the jury, and the principles of sentencing. In its reasoning, the court found no errors in the trial process that warranted a new trial, and it considered the sentence to be within the appropriate range given the circumstances of the case.
The outcome of the appeal was that the conviction and sentence were upheld. The court was satisfied that the trial was conducted fairly and that the sentence was appropriate. This decision means that the appellant's conviction and sentence stand as originally imposed by the trial court. The final orders of the court were to dismiss the appeal and to confirm the original conviction and sentence.
The court considered the arguments presented by both the appellant and the respondent, focusing on the alleged errors during the trial and the severity of the sentence. The court examined the evidence, the trial judge's directions to the jury, and the principles of sentencing. In its reasoning, the court found no errors in the trial process that warranted a new trial, and it considered the sentence to be within the appropriate range given the circumstances of the case.
The outcome of the appeal was that the conviction and sentence were upheld. The court was satisfied that the trial was conducted fairly and that the sentence was appropriate. This decision means that the appellant's conviction and sentence stand as originally imposed by the trial court. The final orders of the court were to dismiss the appeal and to confirm the original conviction and sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.