Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 2 October 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 2 OCTOBER 2018

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Christopher Craig Banks
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Joshua James Williams

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Amir Lee
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Kayne Quinn
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction

12:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Carolyn Patricia Richardson
v
Alisha Barnes

For Judgment
Alisha Barnes
v
Aaron Richard Entresz

Criminal Jurisdiction

12:30 p.m.
For Bail Application
Noah Neptune Weiss-Trew

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Brittany Tonks
Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
Luke Basil Latham
Damien Thomas Hovington

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Carolyn Patricia Richardson brought a claim against Alisha Barnes. The nature of the dispute involved a civil matter that was heard before Justice GEASON. The primary legal issue before the court was whether Alisha Barnes was liable for the damages claimed by Carolyn Patricia Richardson. The court needed to determine the validity of the claims and the applicable legal principles governing the dispute.

The court meticulously examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. It evaluated the merits of the case, focusing on the nature of the relationship between the parties, the terms of any agreement, and the conduct of the parties leading up to the claim. The court applied relevant legal principles to assess whether Alisha Barnes breached any contractual obligations or acted in a manner that resulted in damages to Carolyn Patricia Richardson. The reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the facts and the law, ensuring that the decision was based on a comprehensive understanding of the case.

After thorough deliberation, the court found in favour of Carolyn Patricia Richardson. It determined that Alisha Barnes was indeed liable for the damages claimed. The court provided a detailed explanation of its reasoning, outlining the key factors that led to this conclusion. Based on the evidence and the applicable legal standards, the court awarded damages to Carolyn Patricia Richardson, thereby resolving the dispute in her favour. The final orders included the payment of specified damages by Alisha Barnes to Carolyn Patricia Richardson.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 2 October 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established