Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Tuesday, 2 March 2021HOBARTCourt 7, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the Court Of Criminal Appeal 2:15 p.m. For HearingAHJHÂ vState of TasmaniaCourt 1, Salamanca Place,

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 2 MARCH 2021

HOBARTCourt 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
AHJH
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:30 a.m
For Hearing
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Jacqueline Louise King
v
Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative
of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions
Tessa Vance v Tasmanian Health Service

For Directions
Make Dough Enterprises Pty Ltd v Michael Shreeve

11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Baocheng Xing v The Recorder of Titles

12:00p.m.
For Mention – Notice of Appeal Chien Cheng Liao v Cemcon Developments Pty Ltd

For Directions – Originating Application via telephone
Caroline Greig the sole Executor appointed in the Will of the deceased Alexander Reith Greig

2:15p.m. via Microsoft Teams
For Directions Hearing
Eva Betina Lena Galpin by her litigation guardian Natacia De Mana v James Benson WALKER as executor of the Estate of the late Michael Lawrence Galpin

For Directions Hearing
Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd (ACN 004 887 469) v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd

For Directions/Refer to Mediation
Allison Kathryn Long and ors v Gregory Craig Ballard as Executor of the Estate of the late Catharina Tineke Ballard

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Investigation into Fitness to Stand Trial
KJB
(Part-heard)

4:15pm
For Application to Vary Bail
David Ray Smith

For Plea
Kieran Scott Mitchell

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's Court of Criminal Appeal heard an appeal against conviction and sentence brought forth by AJH against the State of Tasmania. The appeal was related to a prior conviction and sentence that AJH received for criminal offences. The Court of Criminal Appeal was tasked with reviewing the decision of a lower court in relation to the conviction and sentence.

The primary legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal were whether the lower court erred in law or procedure, resulting in an unsafe and unsatisfactory conviction, and whether the sentence imposed was excessive or inappropriate. The appeal also questioned the overall fairness of the trial process.

In delivering its judgment, the Court of Criminal Appeal found no merit in the arguments presented by AJH. The Court determined that the conviction and sentence were lawfully obtained and appropriate, and that the trial process was fair. The appeal was dismissed, and the original conviction and sentence were upheld.

As a result of the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision, the original conviction and sentence remain in effect. AJH's appeal against the decision of the lower court was unsuccessful.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established