Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 2 March 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 58


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 2 MARCH 2021

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
AHJH 
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:30 a.m
For Hearing
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m.
For Mention
Kylie Louise Wise

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Jacqueline Louise King
v
Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative
of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions
Tessa Vance v Tasmanian Health Service

For Directions
Make Dough Enterprises Pty Ltd v Michael Shreeve

11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Baocheng Xing v The Recorder of Titles

12:00p.m.
For Mention – Notice of Appeal
      Chien Cheng Liao v Cemcon Developments Pty Ltd

For Directions – Originating Application via telephone
Caroline Greig the sole Executor appointed in the Will of the deceased Alexander Reith Greig

2:15p.m. via Microsoft Teams
For Directions Hearing
Eva Betina Lena Galpin by her litigation guardian Natacia De Mana v James Benson WALKER as executor of the Estate of the late Michael Lawrence Galpin

For Directions Hearing
Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd (ACN 004 887 469) v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd

For Directions/Refer to Mediation
Allison Kathryn Long and ors v Gregory Craig Ballard as Executor of the Estate of the late Catharina Tineke Ballard

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Investigation into Fitness to Stand Trial
KJB    
(Part-heard)

4:15pm
For Application to Vary Bail
David Ray Smith

For Plea
Kieran Scott Mitchell

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 2 March 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 58
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 58
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was presented with several cases on the 2nd of March 2021. In the Court of Criminal Appeal, the case of AJH v State of Tasmania was scheduled for a hearing at 2:15 pm. The case of Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania was scheduled for a hearing at 9:30 am. In the Civil Jurisdiction, the case of Jacqueline Louise King v Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson was scheduled for judgment at 4:15 pm. Other cases were scheduled for directions and mentions. The Court of Criminal Appeal also had cases scheduled for investigation into fitness to stand trial, application to vary bail, and plea.

The court was required to address various legal issues in these cases. In the case of AJH v State of Tasmania, the court needed to determine whether the defendant was fit to stand trial. In the case of Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania, the court needed to decide whether the defendant's rights were violated during the investigation. In the case of Jacqueline Louise King v Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson, the court needed to determine whether the defendant was liable for damages. Other cases required the court to address issues related to directions, mentions, and appeals.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the case summaries. However, it is expected that the court will provide detailed judgments and orders in its decisions. The court may also provide guidance on legal principles and precedents that apply to the cases. The court's decisions may have significant implications for the parties involved and for the broader legal community.

The final orders of the court were not provided in the case summaries. However, it is expected that the court will provide detailed orders in its judgments. The orders may include directions for further proceedings, determinations of liability, and awards of damages or other remedies. The orders may also include directions for appeals or other legal actions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.