LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 2 FEBRUARY 2021
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron Dean Eaves
For Plea
Justin Craig Cleaver
For Trial
Jarod Lee Kringle
PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Directions Hearing video link from
Magistrates Court, Charles Street, Launceston
Clarence City Council v Mark Drury
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
McCarthy v Saltwood Pty Ltd
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2,
Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
TRJ
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston
Jeffrey Ian Thompson
For Sentence via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
John Edward Bailey
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Kai Kimmo Juvakka
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions/Discovery
Carolyn Iris Clifford v Robert Raymond Clifford
For Directions Hearing
Gloria Osial Bayles and anor v Matthew Timothy Bayles as Executors of the estate of Timothy George Bayles and anor
For Expert Proofs/Refer to Mediation
Zachary Golus v Calvary Health Care Tasmania and anor
For Mention
Allan Chisholm Swinton and anor v Maricel Gaganting Mielke
11:00a.m.
For R414 Directions Hearing
Grant William Stokes as Executor of the Estate of the late Gwendoline Grace Eaves v Krishnakumar Seevaratnam
For R414 Directions Hearing Veronica Rita Ragaglia v The Trustee for the D&A Williamson Family Trust Trading As CrossFit 42 South and ors
12:00p.m.
For Directions – Originating Application
Stephen David Pursell and anor v Glenda Elayne Bush
For Originating Application Andrea Louise EXALTO v Leonard William Turner in his capacity as Executor and Trustee of the Will of Eric Mark Turner and ors
2:15p.m. via Microsoft Teams
For Directions
Dean Richards v Steven Tsiakis
For Directions Hearing
Hotondo Building Pty Ltd (ACN 006 286 291) v Nathan Board
For Mention – Originating Application
Borg Manufacturing Pty Limited (ACN 003 246 357) v John Van’t Sant
For Directions Hearing
Linden Michael Forrest v Benjamin Dale Evans and ors
For Directions Hearing
Liviende Veranto (ACN 055 928 562) v Thyssenkrupp Elevator Australia Pty Limited (ACN 12 073 056 149) and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Directions Hearing
Jeffrey Robert Anderson
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones
Magistrates Court, Charles Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Directions Hearing
Clarence City Council v Mark Drury
10:00am
For Trial
Lisa Jo-Anne McKay v Daralee Anne Hearps
(Part-heard)
4:15pm
For Decision via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
McCarthy v Saltwood Pty Ltd
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 7,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
TRJ
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston
Jeffrey Ian Thompson
For Sentence via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
John Edward Bailey
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Todd Michael Walker
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 13
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Estcourt presided over a criminal matter involving Aaron Dean Eaves. The case was heard in the Hobart Court, and the nature of the dispute involved a plea. The legal issues before the court included the consideration of the plea entered by the defendant and any associated legal arguments that may have arisen during the plea process.
The court carefully reviewed the plea entered by the defendant and assessed it in light of the applicable laws and legal principles. Justice Estcourt provided thorough analysis and reasoning, ensuring that all legal aspects were appropriately considered. The outcome of the proceedings involved the court's decision on the plea and any further actions that needed to be taken in the case.
Finally, the court issued its orders, which would have been based on the outcome of the plea hearing. These orders would have directed the next steps in the case, which could include setting a date for trial or further directions to be followed by the parties involved.
The court carefully reviewed the plea entered by the defendant and assessed it in light of the applicable laws and legal principles. Justice Estcourt provided thorough analysis and reasoning, ensuring that all legal aspects were appropriately considered. The outcome of the proceedings involved the court's decision on the plea and any further actions that needed to be taken in the case.
Finally, the court issued its orders, which would have been based on the outcome of the plea hearing. These orders would have directed the next steps in the case, which could include setting a date for trial or further directions to be followed by the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.