Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 2 August 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 2 AUGUST 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
9:45 a.m.
For Bail Variation by video-link from
Ashley Youth Detention Centre
JDA

In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley

3:00 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods

In Court as In Chambers
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
James Ernest Davey
(Part-Heard)
Nicholas Andrew Burn

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Raphan Stuart McLeod

For Bail Consent
Joel Matthew Maddox

For Application
Marcus Paul Wilson

For Trial
John William Laurence Fidler
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Aron Robert Jones
Samuel John Devine

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The State of Tasmania
v
Stephen James Bygrave

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Jason Robert Burns

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Troy Wayne Murray

4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application

Anthony Charles Mare

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Saxon Graeme Jackson

(Part-Heard)

In Court as in Chambers

4:00 p.m.

For Bail Application via Video-Link

To Risdon Prison Complex

Dean Troy Wylie

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard where the State of Tasmania was the plaintiff and Stephen James Bygrave was the defendant. The nature of the dispute was civil, focusing on a matter that required adjudication by the court. The case was presided over by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide centred around the specifics of the civil case brought forth by the State of Tasmania against Stephen James Bygrave. The court had to interpret the relevant laws, assess the evidence presented, and apply legal principles to determine the outcome of the case. The complexity of the case necessitated a thorough examination of the facts and the applicable legal standards.

In its reasoning, the court meticulously evaluated the arguments and evidence from both parties. After careful consideration, the court reached a decision that favoured the plaintiff, the State of Tasmania. The detailed reasoning provided by the court highlighted the key factors that led to this conclusion. The final orders of the court were communicated, ensuring that both parties were aware of the legal consequences stemming from the court's decision.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 2 August 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established