Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 19 December 2017 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 19 DECEMBER 2017

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Daniel Tasman Mark

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nicholas Tyson Wallner
Daniel Andrew Graham

For Bail Application
BPJ
Barbara Ann Kelty
Erich Leonard Ungerhofer

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

Directions Hearing by Telephone

Connector Park Pty Ltd

RV Pty Limited

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Judgment

Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

A Legal Practitioner

Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

In Court

For Judgment

Shane Gregory Fehlberg

Philip Jason Bumford and anor

Criminal Jurisdiction

11:00 a.m.

For Mention

In the matter of an application by a surety

For Bail Application

Zachary Dylan Wright

For Bail Application

Brittany Tonks

For Mention
Joshua Blair Read

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Sentence via video link from

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Daniel Tasman Mark

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over the sentencing of Daniel Tasman Mark via video link from the Launceston Court. The nature of the dispute was a sentencing hearing for the convicted individual. The court was required to determine the appropriate sentence for the offence committed by the defendant.

The legal issues addressed by the court included the severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The court considered these factors and the applicable sentencing principles to arrive at a just outcome. The outcome of the hearing was the imposition of a sentence by the court, which was not specified in the document.

Justice Wood provided reasons for the sentence, taking into account the evidence presented and the relevant legal principles. The final orders of the court included the imposition of a sentence for the defendant, which was not specified in the document. This case highlights the importance of the court's role in ensuring that justice is served in criminal cases and that sentences are imposed in accordance with the law.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 19 December 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established