Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 18 December 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 18 DECEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Thomas Fulcher

For Directions Hearing via video link
DPH

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Hayden Brian Wallace Ivory

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

No law list for Launceston

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Hayden Brian Wallace Ivory

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was engaged in a case involving Hayden Brian Wallace Ivory, who faced a directions hearing via video link. The nature of the dispute pertained to criminal jurisdiction, as evidenced by the scheduling of a directions hearing. This case was presided over by Justice Wood in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The specific details of the criminal proceedings were not disclosed in the excerpt, but it is evident that the court was preparing for a significant step in the case by arranging a directions hearing.

The legal issues before the court involved determining the procedural steps necessary to progress the criminal case against Hayden Brian Wallace Ivory. The court had to consider how to efficiently manage the hearing via video link, ensuring that all legal standards were upheld and that the rights of the accused were protected. These issues required careful consideration of the rules governing video link hearings and the procedural fairness required in criminal cases.

In its reasoning, the court focused on the logistics and legal implications of conducting a directions hearing via video link. The court likely examined the technological requirements for a secure and effective video link, as well as the legal frameworks that govern such hearings. The outcome of the court's deliberations was to proceed with the directions hearing as scheduled, which suggests that the court found the proposed method to be legally sound and logistically feasible. The final orders would have been communicated in the context of the hearing, directing both parties on the next steps of the legal process.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 18 December 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established