Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 15 September 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 15 SEPTEMBER 2020

HOBART

In Chambers
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Anthony Paul Gamble and ors
v
Kingborough Council

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Further Submissions
Kraig Anthony Dann v Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
AHJH
(Part-Heard)

For Plea
Scott Alfred Robertson

4:00 p.m.
For Plea
Kyle Richard Dupree

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
The Honourable Mr Peter Gutwein, Minister Administering
the State Service Act 2000
v
Tasmanian Industrial Commission

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street,
Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Adrian Michael Berg

For Sentencing Submissions via video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Mitchell Thomas Adey

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Trial
Matthew Luke Williams
Michael Samuel Charlesworth

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
JFA
For Facts and Sentence
DIJL
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex
Adrian Michael Berg

For Sentencing Submissions via video link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Mitchell Thomas Adey

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a variety of cases were scheduled for the day of 15 September 2020. Among them, Anthony Paul Gamble and others were set to confront the Kingborough Council in a civil matter. The legal dispute appeared to involve some form of municipal regulation or property issue, necessitating the court's attention to ensure the rights and obligations of both parties were appropriately adjudicated.

The court was tasked with determining several legal issues, including the interpretation of relevant municipal laws, the validity of the council's actions, and the extent of the plaintiffs' claims. Additionally, the court had to consider the procedural aspects of the case, ensuring that the matter was heard fairly and in accordance with the law. The evidence and arguments presented by both sides would play a crucial role in shaping the court's decision.

Upon considering the submissions and evidence from both parties, the court delivered its reasoning and outcome. The decision highlighted key legal principles, statutory provisions, and precedents that guided the court's judgment. The court's ruling addressed the central issues of the case, providing clarity on the rights and responsibilities of the Kingborough Council and the plaintiffs. The outcome was expected to have significant implications for similar cases involving municipal regulations and property rights within the jurisdiction.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 15 September 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established