Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 13 October, 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 13 OCTOBER, 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Liam Edward Sheridan
Tiahna Jayde Tomac

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jacqueline Louise King
v
Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representatives
of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Legal Argument
John Edward Bailey

For Witness on Final Notice
Max Leonard Bailey

2:15pm
For Mention via video link
Adrian John Roy Harris

For Mention
Aaron Charles McShane

4:15pm
For Bail Application via video link
Kye John Edward Charles Louney
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Referral to Mediation
Christine Anne Wooley v Dr Ana Nusa Naiman and ors

For Directions Hearing
John Brook and anor v Tasmania Health Service

For Statement of claim/Dismiss Action
Kerrie Margaret Edwards v Scott Fletcher and anor

For Expert Proofs
Heather June Griggs v Nakita Stephens

For Directions – Certificate of Readiness
Jay Gasson v Nathan Rainbird

11:00a.m.
For 414 Directions Hearing
Symic Pty Ltd v Wilson Homes Tasmania Pty Ltd

12:00p.m.
For Directions – Originating Application
Leisha Jean Fuller v Larry Raymond Nunn as executor of the Will of the late Peter John Nunn

2:15p.m.
For Directions – Strike Out Application
Gloria Osial Bayles and anor v Matthew Timothy Bayles as Executors of the estate of Timothy Bayles and anor

For Directions – Strike Out Defence and Counterclaim/Set Down for Trial
Paul Glover as Trustee of the Glover Family Trust t/a Glover Electric v Rossglengary Pty Ltd

For Mention – Assessment of Damages/Costs
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmania Networks Pty Ltd

For Pre-trial Conference
Deborah Anne Deakes v Tilford Pty Ltd and anor

3:00pm via Skype
For Originating Application
Selina Rush v Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal and anor

For Directions Hearing
Jason Lee Ronksley and anor v French’s Building Services Pty Ltd and ors

For Originating Application
David Michael Neal and ors v Terrence Anthony Neale and anor

For Directions – Originating Application
Craig Franklin v Darren Hine

For Pre-trial Conference
Maree-Rose Jones v Kingborough Council

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Dawn Anne-Marie Ward

For Trial
Christopher Ernest Denman

4:15p.m.
For Mention via Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dillon John Cruse

For Sentence
Matthew John Cameron
Jesse Elijah Hall

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Directions Hearing
Todd Michael Walker

For Trial
P G T

1:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Damian Leslie Harper

4:00 p.m
For Application via video-link

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of cases on October 13, 2020. Among the cases heard were matters related to admission to the legal profession, directions hearings, and criminal proceedings. Notably, the court handled applications for bail, mentions, and pre-trial conferences, indicating a mix of civil and criminal cases.

The legal issues before the court ranged from admissions to the bar to directions in ongoing litigation. In the civil jurisdiction, cases involved disputes over estates, health services, and contractual obligations. Criminal cases included mentions and trials for various offences. The court's role was to provide directions, assess applications, and ensure that the legal process proceeded in an orderly manner.

The court's reasoning and decisions were tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. For admissions to the legal profession, the court would have assessed the applicants' qualifications and suitability. In directions hearings, the court would have outlined procedural steps and timelines for the cases. For criminal matters, the court considered applications for bail and managed the logistics of trials and mentions.

Final orders varied across cases, reflecting the diverse nature of the proceedings. For admissions, the court would have determined whether to admit the applicants to practice law. In civil cases, orders might have included directions for further evidence or setting trial dates. In criminal cases, the court might have granted or denied bail, scheduled trials, or handled other procedural matters.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 13 October, 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established