LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 13 APRIL 2021
HOBART
PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Heath Maxwell Lethborg
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Parliament Square Landowner Pty Ltd
Court 8 Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jacob Scott Riley-McDonald
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Cade Geordie Haines
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Steven Lee
(part-heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Daniel Cure
For Application to Vary Bail
KPNK
For Bail Application
James Stuart Walker
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Magnus Colby Oakley
Jamie Robertson
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Aaron James Irwin
4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Aaron Dean Eaves
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Brett Bullock v Brett Williams Builders Pty Ltd (ACN 117 477 835)
For Amend Defence
Elizabeth Jane Hope as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Lyndsay Hope and ors v George Papoutsakis and ors
11:00a.m.
For Possession
MYSTATE Bank Limited (ACN 067 729 195) v Lance John David HALL
For R414 Directions Hearing
Desmond Perce David Jennings v Andrew Paul Bryan McCullagh
For R414 Directions Hearing
Mary Carmel Knowles v Andrew Paul Bryan McCullagh
12:00p.m.
For Mention
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd ACN 167 357 299
For Directions
Nicholas Michael Tusyn v Dinesh Loganathan
For Directions
Phillip Crosswell v Neil Robert Readett Executor of the estate of Alan McGinniss
For Directions
Shane Paul Bennett (also known as) Shane Paul Marusarz v Trysten Anthony Bennett as executor of the will of the late Lynette Vivienne Bennett
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions
Neil Bennell and anor v Phillip Anthony Kimber
For Mention
Acton View Pty Ltd (ACN 116 869 955) and ors v Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal
For R414 Directions Hearing
HOTONDO Building Pty Ltd (ACN 006 286 291) v Nathan Board
For Directions
Gerry Anderson and anor v RJ Construction Services No 2 Pty Ltd (ACN: 122 349 973) and ors
For Directions Hearing
Gloria Osial Bayles and anor v Matthew Timothy Bayles as Executors of the estate of Timothy George Bayles and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie and to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Heath Maxwell Lethborg
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 8 Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex
Jacob Scott Riley-McDonald
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
John David Clinton
(Part-heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Carl Maxwell Hall
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Fiona Jayne Hodgetts
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
Nemanja Mrgic
v
Senior Sergeant Russell Judges
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Plea
Lachlan Taylor
Cecil Maurice Mabb
BAS
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Heath Maxwell Lethborg
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 104
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This summary pertains to the Supreme Court of Tasmania, where various criminal and civil cases were heard on 13 April 2021. One of the notable cases involved Heath Maxwell Lethborg, who was to be sentenced via video link from Burnie and to the Supreme Court in Hobart. The legal issues addressed in this case likely revolved around the sentencing of Lethborg, which would involve considerations of the severity of the offence, the offender's criminal history, and the principles of justice and deterrence. The court's reasoning and outcome would have been based on these factors, along with any mitigating or aggravating circumstances presented by either party.
The court's decision in this case would have been influenced by precedents set in similar cases, statutory provisions governing sentencing, and the overarching objectives of the criminal justice system. The final orders would have included the specific sentence imposed on Lethborg, which could range from imprisonment to fines, community service, or other forms of punishment. The court's decision would have been communicated to both parties and, where necessary, to the public, ensuring transparency and adherence to the rule of law.
The court's decision in this case would have been influenced by precedents set in similar cases, statutory provisions governing sentencing, and the overarching objectives of the criminal justice system. The final orders would have included the specific sentence imposed on Lethborg, which could range from imprisonment to fines, community service, or other forms of punishment. The court's decision would have been communicated to both parties and, where necessary, to the public, ensuring transparency and adherence to the rule of law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.