Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 8 July 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 218


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 8 JULY 2021

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Adrian James Roy Oates

11:45a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Floyd Dylan Mansfield

12:30p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jayden Garry Fehlberg

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
JPP
(part-heard)

4:00p.m
For application to vary bail
Frederick Craig Rushton

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Darcy Vincent Bull

For Bail Application via video-link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Zachary Nathaniel Galpin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Danelle Maree Barker

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via Teams to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Directions Hearing
In the matter of the Estate of Janice May Faulkner ~ Gerald John Faulkner v Ian Douglas Dickenson and Barry Quentin Cunningham and Andrew John Cameron as Executors of the Will of the late Janice May Faulkner

For Mention
Maree Matic v Simpson Networks Pty Ltd and ors

For R414 Directions Hearing
Jodie Jones v Bradley Robert Jones

For R414 Directions Hearing
In the Matter of the Estate of the Late Robert Philip Jones: Jodie Jones v Bradley Robert Jones

11:00a.m.
For Strike Out
Liesbeth Henriette Garnham v Robert Russell Ellis and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Adrian James Roy Oates

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Stewart Ashley Martin

4:00p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Danelle Maree Barker

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via Teams from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Directions Hearing
In the matter of the Estate of Janice May Faulkner ~ Gerald John Faulkner v Ian Douglas Dickenson and Barry Quentin Cunningham and Andrew John Cameron as Executors of the Will of the late Janice May Faulkner

For R414 Directions Hearing
Jodie Jones v Bradley Robert Jones

For R414 Directions Hearing
In the Matter of the Estate of the Late Robert Philip Jones: Jodie Jones v Bradley Robert Jones

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Adrian James Roy Oates

12:30p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jayden Garry Fehlberg

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie 
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Zachary Nathaniel Galpin

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
and to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Danelle Maree Barker

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 8 July 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 218
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 218
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of criminal and civil matters on 8 July 2021. There were several sentencing hearings, bail applications, and directions hearings scheduled across the state, with various courts hearing matters via video-link. One of the key criminal cases involved Adrian James Roy Oates, who had sentencing hearings scheduled in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. Another notable case involved Jayden Garry Fehlberg, who also had a sentencing hearing via video-link.

The court was required to address issues such as determining appropriate sentences for the convicted individuals, assessing bail applications to ensure public safety and the likelihood of reoffending, and providing directions in estate and civil matters to manage the proceedings effectively. The court had to balance the principles of justice, including the protection of the community and the rights of the accused, while also ensuring the efficient administration of justice.

Justice Wood, presiding over several of the hearings, emphasised the need for appropriate sentences that reflect the gravity of the offences committed. In the case of bail applications, the court considered the risk of reoffending and the potential impact on the community. In civil matters, the court provided directions to streamline the proceedings and ensure they proceeded in an orderly and timely manner. The outcomes of the hearings were largely in line with legal precedents and the specific circumstances of each case.

The final orders included sentences for the convicted individuals, with considerations given to factors such as the nature of the offence, the offender’s criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Bail applications were either granted or refused based on a thorough assessment of the risk to the community and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court. In civil matters, the court issued directions to manage the proceedings effectively, ensuring that the rights of all parties were protected and that the matters could be resolved in a fair and timely manner.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.