LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 8 APRIL 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Vanessa Dare
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Aaron James Irwin
Steven Craig Murtagh
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Lilli Marlene Asprey
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Hobart Reception Prison
James Stuart Walker
For Bail Application via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Launceston Reception Prison
Nathan Mayne
For Bail Application via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Rob Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Magnus Oakley
Not before 12:00pm
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Launceston Reception Prison
Fiona Jane Hodgetts
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Vanessa Dare
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Aaron James Irwin
Steven Craig Murtagh
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Lilli Marlene Asprey
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Hobart Reception Prison
James Stuart Walker
For Bail Application via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Launceston Reception Prison
Nathan Mayne
For Bail Application via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Magnus Oakley
Not before 12pm
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Launceston Reception Prison
Fiona Jane Hodgetts
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Vanessa Dare
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 100
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Pearce presided over a series of criminal matters, with the proceedings held via video link from various locations including Launceston, Burnie, and Hobart. Among the cases mentioned were those involving Vanessa Dare, Aaron James Irwin, Steven Craig Murtagh, Lilli Marlene Asprey, James Stuart Walker, Nathan Mayne, Magnus Oakley, and Fiona Jane Hodgetts. These individuals faced various charges and proceedings, including bail applications and mentions.
The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal matters, including the assessment of bail applications and the management of ongoing criminal cases. For the bail applications, the court had to determine whether the applicants met the criteria for release on bail, considering factors such as the nature of the offence, the risk of flight, the risk to the community, and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court. For the mentions, the court needed to address procedural issues and ensure that the accused were properly informed of the charges against them and the progress of their cases.
Justice Pearce provided detailed considerations for each case, balancing the rights of the accused with the interests of the community. In the bail applications, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence and submissions presented by both the prosecution and defence, making decisions based on the specific circumstances of each case. For the mentions, the court ensured that all parties were aware of the status and next steps of their cases, providing clear directions for future hearings. The outcome for each case varied based on the unique facts and legal arguments presented.
The final orders issued by Justice Pearce reflected the outcomes of the court's deliberations, with bail granted or denied, and directions given for the continuation of the criminal proceedings. The decisions demonstrated the court's commitment to ensuring a fair and just process for all involved, adhering to the principles of criminal justice.
The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal matters, including the assessment of bail applications and the management of ongoing criminal cases. For the bail applications, the court had to determine whether the applicants met the criteria for release on bail, considering factors such as the nature of the offence, the risk of flight, the risk to the community, and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court. For the mentions, the court needed to address procedural issues and ensure that the accused were properly informed of the charges against them and the progress of their cases.
Justice Pearce provided detailed considerations for each case, balancing the rights of the accused with the interests of the community. In the bail applications, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence and submissions presented by both the prosecution and defence, making decisions based on the specific circumstances of each case. For the mentions, the court ensured that all parties were aware of the status and next steps of their cases, providing clear directions for future hearings. The outcome for each case varied based on the unique facts and legal arguments presented.
The final orders issued by Justice Pearce reflected the outcomes of the court's deliberations, with bail granted or denied, and directions given for the continuation of the criminal proceedings. The decisions demonstrated the court's commitment to ensuring a fair and just process for all involved, adhering to the principles of criminal justice.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.