Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 6 October 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 6 OCTOBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Shaun Keverall Kaye
v
State of Tasmania

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Kevin Anthony Deakin
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jessie James A’Hearne

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Kye John Louney

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

In Court as In Chambers

For Application
Ian John Picone and Lynette Picone
v
Hobart City Council

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Submissions
Anne Sculthorpe and anor
v
Patricia Sculthorpe by her
administrator the Public Trustee

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Christopher Benson and ors
v
Steven Hernyk and ors

For Mention
Salavatore Algeri, Trustee of the IR and
GN Benson Family Trust and the Benson
Family Trust and anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a number of cases were listed for judgment, hearing, and mention on 6 October 2016. The court was involved in both criminal and civil matters. One notable case was that of Jessie James A’Hearne, which was listed for sentencing before Justice Brett. Another case, Kevin Anthony Deakin v State of Tasmania, was listed for a hearing before Justice Brett, also concerning criminal matters. Additionally, there were civil matters such as Ian John Picone and Lynette Picone v Hobart City Council, listed before Associate Justice Holt, and Anne Sculthorpe and anor v Patricia Sculthorpe by her administrator the Public Trustee, listed before Justice Brett for submissions.

The court faced various legal issues across these cases. For instance, in the criminal case of Jessie James A’Hearne, the court needed to determine an appropriate sentence. The hearing in Kevin Anthony Deakin v State of Tasmania likely involved issues of criminal law and procedure. In the civil case of Ian John Picone and Lynette Picone v Hobart City Council, the court had to address matters related to local government and possibly statutory interpretation. The submissions in Anne Sculthorpe and anor v Patricia Sculthorpe by her administrator the Public Trustee would have required the court to consider issues such as the validity of the claim and any relevant statutory or common law principles.

In rendering its decisions, the court carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case. For Jessie James A’Hearne, Justice Brett delivered a sentence that reflected the seriousness of the crime and the principles of sentencing in the Tasmanian criminal justice system. The outcome in Kevin Anthony Deakin v State of Tasmania was contingent on the specific arguments and evidence presented during the hearing. In the civil case of Ian John Picone and Lynette Picone v Hobart City Council, Associate Justice Holt's decision would have depended on the specific facts and legal issues raised. Similarly, Justice Brett's consideration of submissions in Anne Sculthorpe and anor v Patricia Sculthorpe by her administrator the Public Trustee would have been informed by the merits of the claim and relevant legal principles.

The final orders of the court would have been communicated in accordance with the outcomes of each individual case, ensuring that justice was served in both criminal and civil matters.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 6 October 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established