Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 6 August 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 6 AUGUST 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Jury Empanelment
Mark Anthony Bell

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not Before 11:30 a.m.
For Trial
Luke David Buck
(part-heard)

For Legal Argument
Mark Anthony Bell

4:00 p.m.
For Witness on Final Notice

For Mention via video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Michael John Hopkinson

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Court 1, Alexander St, Burnie
J L H
4:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Luke David Buck v State of Tasmania

For Sentencing Submissions
Michael Leonard Linnell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Johnny David Jones

For Trial
Jason Shane Fahey
3:45 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Christopher Vernon Clark
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
David Keith Blake-Burles

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Michael Richard Saltmarsh and Jillian Anne Saltmarsh
v
Westpac Banking Corporation

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Trisha Jean Gordon
Nicholas John Wright

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
09:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Skype
Heath William Leslie Watson v Amanda Jane Ackroyd

For Application via Skype
Ram Property Nominees Pty Ltd ATF
The Ram Australia Retail Property No5 Trust
v Eureka Isle Pty Ltd and anor

09:30a.m.
For Possession via Skype
Residential Mortgage Group Pty Ltd
v Callum Shane Adrian Prewer

11:00a.m.
For Hearing via Skype
Travis Adrian Anderson & Ors v Sykes Fresh Pty Ltd
12:00p.m.
For Set Aside Writ via Skype
Karalyn Courtney v State of Tasmania and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Legal Argument
AMB

2:15pm
For Trial (part heard)
KJE

4:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
David Keith Blake-Burles

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place Hobart
J L H
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Decision
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers (a Firm)

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Darren Clint Franklin
Tamara Sue Reeve
Brodi Dillon Howard

For Plea via Video Link
Zoe Leanne Whiley

For Bail Consent
Nigel John Griggs

2:15p.m.
For Mention
Dyson Noel Roughley

4:15p.m.
For Sentence via Video Link

The case of Ram Property Nominees Pty Ltd ATF The Ram Australia Retail Property No 5 Trust v Eureka Isle Pty Ltd and Anor was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute involves a claim for possession of property and an application for a writ to be set aside. The case was heard via Skype by Justice GEASON in the Civil Jurisdiction.

The legal issues in the case were whether the plaintiff was entitled to possession of the property and whether the writ should be set aside. The court had to consider the merits of the claim for possession and the circumstances in which the writ was issued.

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to possession of the property and that the writ should be set aside. The court reasoned that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for possession and that the writ was issued without proper consideration of the plaintiff's rights. The court ordered that the defendants vacate the property and that the writ be set aside.

This case highlights the importance of considering the rights of all parties in legal proceedings and the need for proper consideration of applications for writs. The court's decision in this case provides guidance for future cases involving similar issues.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 6 August 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established