Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 4 February 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15 p.m.For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 16


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 4 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m
For Sentence
Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

For Directions Hearing
JAJ

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron Dean Eaves

For Trial
Jarod Lee Kringle
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Kai Kimmo Juvakka
(part-heard)

4:00p.m.
For Mention
ZHB

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Dante Mauriello
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Mention
John William Foster v John Martin Pickup and ors

For Mention
Amelia Jane Rowwe v Terrence Andrews and ors

11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Mesh & Bar Pty Limited (ACN 084 464 746)
v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
(ACN 005 357 522) and ors

2:15p.m.
For Directions
Ki Soon Kim v Hotas Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 125 522 367) and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy        

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones

For Bail Consent
Jamie Stephen Sexton

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link
from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Mention
John William Foster v John Martin Pickup and ors

For Mention
Amelia Jane Rowwe v Terrence Andrews and ors

BURNIE

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via from Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Legal Argument
Eric Denby

Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 16
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The court dealt with various criminal cases, including the sentencing of Bryer Imre Nagy. Nagy faced charges related to criminal activity, and the case was presided over by Justice Wood in Hobart. The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate sentence for Nagy, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, as well as any mitigating or aggravating factors.

In delivering the judgment, the court considered the severity of Nagy's actions, the impact on the victims, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. The court found that Nagy's actions warranted a custodial sentence but also recognised the potential for rehabilitation. The court imposed a sentence that balanced these considerations, resulting in a custodial term accompanied by conditions aimed at facilitating Nagy's reintegration into society.

The court's decision reflects a careful balancing of the principles of punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation, tailored to the specific circumstances of the case. The final orders included the imposition of a prison sentence with specific conditions designed to support Nagy's rehabilitation and reintegration efforts.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.