Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 30 June 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 131


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 30 JUNE 2016

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link to
Court 1, Launceston
Shadi Farhat

To Follow
Civil Jurisdiction
For Motion to Review by video link to
Court 1, Launceston
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and anor
v
Aaron Michael Marks

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link
To Court 1, Launceston
Stuart Barry Russell
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link
To Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Melanie Jane Johnson

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link
To Risdon Prison Complex
Gaurav Endlay
Tristan Jacob Hinds

For Mention via video-link
To Mary Hutchinson’s Women Prison
Katie Ann Harrison

For Mention via video-link to
Rob Barwick Minimum Security Prison
William Henry Richardson
Richard Francis Clarke
Alan Noel Lesina

For Mention via video-link to
Hobart Reception Prison
Beverley Anne Banfield

For Mention via video-link to
Wilfred Lopes Centre and
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
JHS

For Mention
Benjamin Lee Noyes
Kevin Michael Phillips
Rebecca Rusterholz
Kenneth John Fisher
Kelly Raema Mundy-Page
DJT
Nicole Lee Sampey
JBH
Jarrod Fletcher

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
SJH
Daniel Jacob Hansen

For Bail Consent
Renee Ferguson
Edward Whyndham Gearman
Duc Van Nguyen
Mark James Rutherford
Samuel James Wall
Adrian Michael Flounders
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Daniel John Kirk
Emma May Wordsworth

For Bail Variation
Michelle Lee Arnott

For Sentence
Alle Sleman
Nazih Abbas

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT

Civil Jurisdiction

In Court as in Chambers

10:30 a.m.

For Hearing

A Legal Practitioner

v

Andrea Boxall and the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston

Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Liam Lawrence
v
Australiansuper Pty Ltd and anor

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Sharlene Brown and anor
v
Paul De Deuge and ors

4:45 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Alison Turner
v
Director of Inland Fisheries

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
DTB
Shadi Farhat
Mickheal Bechara
Bridgette Allen
Shane Mark Ivey
Harry Kourakis
Conniey Rea Riley
Aaron John Harvey
Jay Ashley Whatley
Coby Wells
Jake Wells
Troy Wayne Murray
LAP

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Andrew Dickson
JDS
PDW
Brooke Alyce Andriuskevicius

To Follow
For Plea
Mathew Luke Williams
Jodi Dale Williams
Derek George Arnol
Ethen Wayne Nicholls
Luke Jack Walker
Dane Lindon Squires

Civil Jurisdiction
To Follow For Motion to Review
By video link to Court 2, Hobart
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and anor v Aaron Michael Marks

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing
By video link to Court 7, Hobart
Stuart Barry Russell v State of Tasmania

4:30pm For Sentence

Jacob Adam Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood

9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Melanie Jane Johnson

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link from
Wilfred Lopes Centre
and Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

JHS

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 30 June 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 131
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 131
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 30 June 2016, the Supreme Court of Tasmania heard various matters, both civil and criminal, across multiple locations. Notable cases included a directions hearing in the criminal matter of Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and another versus Aaron Michael Marks, presided over by Chief Justice BLOW in Court 7, Hobart. Another significant case was the sentence hearing of Melanie Jane Johnson, which was conducted via video link from the Wilfred Lopes Centre and Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart, presided over by Justice WOOD. Additionally, a directions hearing in the civil matter of Liam Lawrence versus Australiansuper Pty Ltd and another was scheduled for Launceston via telephone.

The primary legal issues addressed in the mentioned cases revolved around the procedural aspects of criminal and civil cases. In the criminal case of Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and another versus Aaron Michael Marks, the court was required to determine appropriate directions for the proceeding. In the civil case of Liam Lawrence versus Australiansuper Pty Ltd and another, the court needed to set directions for the management and progression of the litigation. The sentence hearing of Melanie Jane Johnson involved the determination of an appropriate penalty in light of the criminal charges and the mitigating or aggravating factors presented.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were tailored to the specifics of each case. For the criminal matter of Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and another versus Aaron Michael Marks, the court provided detailed directions to streamline the proceedings and ensure a fair trial. In the case of Melanie Jane Johnson, the court delivered a sentence, taking into consideration the evidence and legal arguments presented. For the civil case of Liam Lawrence versus Australiansuper Pty Ltd and another, the court issued directions that aimed to effectively manage the litigation process.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the text, but it can be inferred that the court would have issued appropriate orders in line with the outcomes of the hearings and directions given.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.