Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 3 May 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 396


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 3 MAY 2018

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Gypsy Lea Maddy
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Mention

Russell Brett Sinclair

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Christopher David Eastley

For Mention
Jesse Rick Littlejohn

For Trial
Richard Francis Clarke
Jason Samuel McCormick

4:00 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via Video-Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
LGH

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
Casey Richard Cowen

For Directions Hearing
Emma Louise Bishop
Michael William Triffitt
Jeffrey Ian Thompson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Trial
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board and Anor
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment via Video-Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Forico Pty Ltd
v
Jonathan H Sive and Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
NHJR    

4:00pm For Directions Hearing by Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Anthony Wayne Slade

4:15pm For Bail Application
Jacob Riley-McDonald

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Sentencing Submissions via Video-Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
LGH

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Civil Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Judgment via Video-Link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Forico Pty Ltd v Jonathan H Sive and Ors

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Robert John Bell
Todd Michael Walker

For Trial
Dane Ronald Pyke
(Part-heard)

4:00 p.m.

For Mention
Damien Wayne Smith

For Bail Variation
Robert James Donaghy

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 3 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 396
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 396
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on Thursday, 3 May 2018. Notable among these were criminal cases involving Gypsy Lea Maddy, Christopher David Eastley, and Russell Brett Sinclair. The court also dealt with civil matters such as the case of Zahid Akram Khan Sher v Motor Accidents Insurance Board and Anor. In addition, the Launceston and Burnie courts handled various criminal cases and bail applications.

The legal issues before the court included whether Gypsy Lea Maddy was guilty of the charges brought against her, the eligibility of Christopher David Eastley for bail, and the appropriate sentencing for Russell Brett Sinclair. The court also needed to determine the outcome of the civil dispute between Zahid Akram Khan Sher and the Motor Accidents Insurance Board. The cases required the court to consider the evidence presented, applicable laws, and precedents to make informed decisions.

The court carefully examined the evidence and arguments presented in each case. For instance, in the criminal cases, the court assessed the credibility of witnesses and the sufficiency of the prosecution's case. In the civil matter, the court considered the terms of the contract and statutory obligations. The judges applied relevant legal principles to reach their conclusions. The outcomes varied, with some defendants being found guilty and others being granted bail or having their cases adjourned for further evidence.

The final orders of the court included the conviction of certain defendants, bail being granted or denied, and directions for further proceedings. In the civil case, the court provided a judgment that addressed the specific issues raised by the parties. The detailed reasoning and outcomes provided clarity and direction for the parties involved in these cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.