LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 29 JULY 2021
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
4:15pm
For Mention
Hayden Joel Larner
Anthony Craig Dillon
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Shane Peter Anderson
Joshua John Chettle
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kaydon Poole
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Witnesses on Final Notice
For Trial
Matthew Steven McCulloch
(part-heard)
2:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
James Stuart Walker
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Corey Shane Wordsworth
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Rodney John Ramskill
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Kaydon Poole
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Barbara Anne Etter
v
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
Barbara Anne Etter
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Rodney John Ramskill
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Shane Peter Anderson
Joshua John Chettle
For Sentence via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kaydon Poole
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the court presided over by Justice Brett considered a number of criminal cases on 29 July 2021. The cases included various stages such as mention, trial, and sentencing. Among the defendants were Matthew John Davey, Hayden Joel Larner, Anthony Craig Dillon, Shane Peter Anderson, Joshua John Chettle, and Kaydon Poole, with several of these cases involving video-link sentencing.
The primary legal issues before the court involved the determination of guilt, sentencing, and the application of legal principles to the specific circumstances of each defendant. The court had to assess the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both prosecution and defence, and apply relevant statutes and case law to reach a decision on each matter. The court also needed to consider the appropriate sentences, taking into account factors such as the severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Justice Brett provided detailed reasoning for each case, focusing on the facts, the legal standards, and the specific circumstances of the defendants. For sentencing, the court considered the gravity of the crimes, the impact on victims, and the principles of justice and deterrence. The court made decisions based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and arguments presented, ensuring that each defendant received a fair hearing. The outcome involved various sentences being handed down, with some defendants being remanded and others receiving specific sentences as determined by the court.
The final orders included remanding some defendants in custody pending further court appearances, sentencing others to specific terms of imprisonment or fines, and directing certain cases to proceed to trial or further mention dates. The court also addressed issues related to bail applications and directions hearings, ensuring that all legal processes were followed appropriately.
The primary legal issues before the court involved the determination of guilt, sentencing, and the application of legal principles to the specific circumstances of each defendant. The court had to assess the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both prosecution and defence, and apply relevant statutes and case law to reach a decision on each matter. The court also needed to consider the appropriate sentences, taking into account factors such as the severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Justice Brett provided detailed reasoning for each case, focusing on the facts, the legal standards, and the specific circumstances of the defendants. For sentencing, the court considered the gravity of the crimes, the impact on victims, and the principles of justice and deterrence. The court made decisions based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and arguments presented, ensuring that each defendant received a fair hearing. The outcome involved various sentences being handed down, with some defendants being remanded and others receiving specific sentences as determined by the court.
The final orders included remanding some defendants in custody pending further court appearances, sentencing others to specific terms of imprisonment or fines, and directing certain cases to proceed to trial or further mention dates. The court also addressed issues related to bail applications and directions hearings, ensuring that all legal processes were followed appropriately.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.