Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 28 November 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 28 NOVEMBER 2019

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Kraig Anthony Dann v

Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc
(Part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Michael David Maple

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Legal Argument

Dirk Perry Fulton

David Tony Carver

2:15p.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing

Christopher Richard Stevenson

4:00p.m.
For Mention

Christopher Robert Condon

For Legal Argument

Brett Langdon Wescombe

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie

Kevin John Fitzpatrick

Jason Paul Fitzpatrick

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial (part heard)

Jacob Adam Williams
Marcus John Williams

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing

Jake Christopher Morgan

To Follow:
For Bail Application

Stephen James Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

NDT

TLR

Kevin John Fitzpatrick

Jason Paul Fitzpatrick

2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions

Krishna Kali Brown

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kraig Anthony Dann initiated legal proceedings against the Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute involves claims by Dann against the Club, although the specifics of these claims are not detailed in the document. The case was heard by Justice WOOD in Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The legal issues central to the case were not explicitly outlined in the document, but they likely pertain to the claims made by Dann against the Bowls Club, potentially involving matters such as contractual obligations, negligence, or other civil disputes.

The court's reasoning and the outcome of the case are not provided in the document. Given that this is a part-heard case, it is likely that the proceedings are still ongoing, and any detailed judicial analysis or decision would be reserved for a later stage of the trial. The document does not provide information on whether the court reached any preliminary findings or made any significant procedural determinations at this stage.

If the case progresses, further orders or detailed judgments will be necessary to fully understand the court's resolution of the issues at hand. As it stands, the document only lists the case as being part-heard, indicating that the litigation is still in its early or intermediate phases. The final orders of the court will depend on the outcome of the full hearing and any subsequent appeals or legal arguments presented by the parties involved.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 28 November 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established