Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 28 November 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 28 NOVEMBER 2019

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Kraig Anthony Dann v

Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc
(Part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Michael David Maple

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application

Raymond Michael Horton

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Legal Argument

Dirk Perry Fulton

David Tony Carver

2:15p.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing

Christopher Richard Stevenson

4:00p.m.
For Mention

Christopher Robert Condon

For Legal Argument

Brett Langdon Wescombe

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie

Kevin John Fitzpatrick

Jason Paul Fitzpatrick

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial (part heard)

Jacob Adam Williams
Marcus John Williams

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing

Jake Christopher Morgan

To Follow:
For Bail Application

Stephen James Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

NDT

TLR

Kevin John Fitzpatrick

Jason Paul Fitzpatrick

2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions

Krishna Kali Brown

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kraig Anthony Dann was the plaintiff in a case heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, where he sued the Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the document, but it was part-heard on 28 November 2019. The central legal issues that the court had to decide involved the rights and obligations of the parties under the circumstances of the case. The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided text, but it was noted that the case was part-heard, indicating that the proceedings were ongoing.

The reasoning of the court and the outcome of the legal issues were not provided in the document. The court would have examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, applying relevant laws and legal principles to reach a decision. The final outcome would have been communicated in subsequent court sessions or in a written judgment. The document did not provide information on the court's final orders or decisions in this matter.

No additional paragraph was needed as the document did not provide sufficient information to warrant a fourth paragraph. The case was ongoing, and further details would have been available in subsequent court sessions or in a written judgment. The final orders of the court were not stated in the provided text.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 28 November 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established