Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 27 August 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 852


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 27 AUGUST 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Allan John Duffy

In Chambers
4:45 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
RDH
JAR
ED

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Ray Kennedy

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
Shaaqill Fontaine

10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
Michael John Hopkinson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
From 2:00p.m.
Telephone Directions Hearings in the
Absence of Accused Persons

To Follow:
4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via Video Link
to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Tamara Sue Reeve

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30pm
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Adam John Rex Stone

4:15pm
For Sentence
Ahlen Arn Kikuchi
Tara Maree Astell

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via Video Link
from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tamara Sue Reeve

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 27 August 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 852
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 852
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves the Supreme Court of Tasmania, which heard various matters on Thursday, 27 August 2020. The court was engaged in sentencing Allan John Duffy, handling telephone directions hearings for RDHJARED, admitting Ray Kennedy to the legal profession, and considering bail applications for Shaaqill Fontaine, Michael John Hopkinson, and Adam John Rex Stone, as well as an application to vary bail for Tamara Sue Reeve. The court also sentenced Ahlen Arn Kikuchi and Tara Maree Astell.

The legal issues addressed by the court encompassed a range of criminal and civil matters. In the criminal cases, the court had to determine appropriate sentences for the accused, assess the merits of bail applications, and consider variations to existing bail conditions. In the civil matter, the court needed to decide whether Ray Kennedy met the necessary criteria for admission to the legal profession.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided document, but the matters were heard before various justices, indicating the court's consideration of each case's specific circumstances. The outcomes, including the final orders, would be communicated separately in the respective judgments or orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.