LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 23 SEPTEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Phillip Mark Dare
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
KBR
Thursday 23 September 2021
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
12noon
For application to vary bail
Corey Adam Lockwood
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For SentenceBanjo Manser
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Bail Consent
John William Milligan
For Trial
JAR
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
KBR
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 320
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Phillip Mark Dare was brought before Chief Justice Blow in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, where a criminal trial was set to commence. The nature of the dispute involved charges against Dare, which were not specified in the provided excerpt. The court was tasked with addressing the legal issues arising from these charges. The primary legal issue the court had to decide was the guilt or innocence of Dare in relation to the criminal charges laid against him.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the excerpt provided. However, as this was a trial commencement, the court would have likely outlined the procedures, evidence to be presented, and the roles of each party involved. The final orders of the court would typically include directives for the commencement of the trial, setting a date for the presentation of evidence, and possibly instructions for jury selection if applicable. The court may also have addressed any preliminary legal arguments or motions that needed resolution before the trial could proceed.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the excerpt provided. However, as this was a trial commencement, the court would have likely outlined the procedures, evidence to be presented, and the roles of each party involved. The final orders of the court would typically include directives for the commencement of the trial, setting a date for the presentation of evidence, and possibly instructions for jury selection if applicable. The court may also have addressed any preliminary legal arguments or motions that needed resolution before the trial could proceed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.