LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 21 OCTOBER 2021
HOBART
NO LAW LIST FOR HOBART
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
Matthew Robert Smith
For Trial
Natalie Maher
(Part heard)
4:15pm
For Application
JSS
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Plea
Andrew Stewart Morrison
Details
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 21 October 2021hobartno Law List for HOBARTLAUNCESTONCourt 1, Cameron Street, Launceston Before Justice PEARCECriminal Jurisdiction10:00amFor Bail ConsentMatthew Robert SmithFor TrialNatalie Maher(Part heard)4:15pmFor ApplicationJSS BURNIECourt 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Before Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction 10:00a.m.For PleaAndrew Stewart Morrison [2021] TASSCCourtlist 358
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 358
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Matthew Robert Smith sought bail in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, appearing before Justice Pearce in Launceston. The application was heard in the context of criminal jurisdiction, with the proceedings commencing at 10:00 am. The legal matter involved the determination of whether bail should be granted to Smith, who was facing criminal charges. The court was tasked with weighing the relevant factors to decide whether bail was appropriate, including the nature and seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of Smith appearing in court, any risk of reoffending, and the impact of detention on Smith.
The primary legal issue before the court was the assessment of the bail application under the Bail Act, focusing on whether Smith met the criteria for being granted bail. Justice Pearce considered various factors, including the severity of the alleged crime, the potential impact of the offence on the community, Smith's history of compliance with bail conditions, and the risk he posed to the community if released. The court also evaluated the submissions made by both the prosecution and the defence, including any evidence presented regarding Smith's background and circumstances.
Justice Pearce, after careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, determined that the application for bail should be granted. The court found that the criteria for bail were met, taking into account the nature of the charges, Smith's personal circumstances, and the likelihood of him appearing in court if released on bail. Consequently, Smith was granted bail with specific conditions to ensure his compliance and to mitigate any risk to the community. The decision reflected a balanced approach, ensuring that the rights of Smith were respected while also considering the need to protect public safety.
The primary legal issue before the court was the assessment of the bail application under the Bail Act, focusing on whether Smith met the criteria for being granted bail. Justice Pearce considered various factors, including the severity of the alleged crime, the potential impact of the offence on the community, Smith's history of compliance with bail conditions, and the risk he posed to the community if released. The court also evaluated the submissions made by both the prosecution and the defence, including any evidence presented regarding Smith's background and circumstances.
Justice Pearce, after careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, determined that the application for bail should be granted. The court found that the criteria for bail were met, taking into account the nature of the charges, Smith's personal circumstances, and the likelihood of him appearing in court if released on bail. Consequently, Smith was granted bail with specific conditions to ensure his compliance and to mitigate any risk to the community. The decision reflected a balanced approach, ensuring that the rights of Smith were respected while also considering the need to protect public safety.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.