LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 21 JULY 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Mark William Wall
For Trial
Adrian Patrick Farnell
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
KDL
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brendan Lee Jones
Stuart Alexander Ferguson
For Trial
Benjamin Angus Shield
(Part-Heard)
3:45 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Louisa Stevenson
For Bail Application
Stephen John Edwards
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Mary Ann Brownell
v
Christine Robinson
(Part Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
1:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Rooke Street Pty Ltd
v
KCW Developments Pty Ltd and ors
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Phillip Watts and anor
v
Commonwealth Bank of Australia and anor
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
Phillip Watts and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jamie Michael Richards
To Follow
For Sentencing Submissions
Jonathan Alan Dennis Payne
3:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Stephen Craig Wheldon
4:15pm For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Timothy Peter Hingston
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:45pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Louisa Stevenson
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Timothy Peter Hingston
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 21 July 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 149
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 149
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court needed to address varied across the cases. For instance, in the case of Mary Ann Brownell versus Christine Robinson, the court had to consider the merits of the civil claim brought forth by Brownell. The specifics of the claims and defenses were not detailed in the list but would have involved interpretation of contract law, tort law, or possibly property law, depending on the nature of the dispute. In the criminal cases, the court was required to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants based on the evidence presented, and to decide on appropriate sentences if the defendants were found guilty.
The reasoning and outcomes of each case would be detailed in the court's written judgments, which would be issued at a later date. The court's decisions would be based on a thorough examination of the evidence and the applicable law. For the civil cases, the court would consider the legal principles relevant to the disputes, such as contractual obligations or liability for damages. For the criminal cases, the court would assess the prosecution's evidence against the defence's arguments and decide on the appropriate sentence if a defendant was found guilty.
The final orders of the court would be communicated through written judgments, which would outline the court's findings and the reasons for the decisions made. These judgments would be an essential part of the legal process, providing clarity on the application of the law to the specific facts of each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.