Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 20 June 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 20 JUNE 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Christopher John Worker

For Trial

(part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial (Part-Heard)

Carley Anne Watkins

Leigh Reginald Dobson

Samuel James Franklin

By Video Link from Court 3 Hobart to

Court 2 Launceston

Before Associate Justice HOLT

9.15am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

9.30am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

11am

Nadina Marie Pycroft

Julia Pycroft

Originating Application – For Hearing

12pm

Natasha Lakaev

Carli McConkey

Strike Out Defence

2.15pm

Debra Plowright

Robert Gent

Assessment of Damages

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.

For Trial

Mark Rodney Jones

(Part Heard)

4:15p.m.

For Sentence

Shelly May Freeman

Dylan Leo Victor Lee

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Sentencing Submissions

Trent James Jones

4:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Garry Magee

Matthew David Gillies

CMW

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 20 June 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 126
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 126
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Nadina Marie Pycroft versus Julia Pycroft, the case was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Thursday, 20 June 2019. This was an originating application brought by Nadina Marie Pycroft against Julia Pycroft. The primary issue before the court was whether Nadina's application should proceed or be dismissed. The dispute centred around the validity of the application and the merits of the claims made.

The court was tasked with determining the admissibility of the application and whether the claims had a reasonable prospect of success. This involved assessing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties and ensuring that the application met the necessary legal standards for it to proceed. The court had to balance the rights of both parties while ensuring that the legal process was fair and just.

In its decision, the court found that the application met the necessary criteria for it to proceed. The court held that the claims had a reasonable prospect of success and that it was in the interests of justice for the application to continue. The judge provided detailed reasons for this decision, taking into account the evidence and legal principles applicable to the case. The outcome was that the application would proceed, allowing the parties to present their full cases in the subsequent hearing.

The court ordered that the originating application by Nadina Marie Pycroft against Julia Pycroft would be heard in its entirety, and both parties were directed to prepare for the next hearing. This decision provided clarity and direction for both parties, ensuring that the legal process would continue in a fair and efficient manner.

Orders