Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Thursday 2 May 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 2 MAY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jacob Vernon Hardy
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Belinda Leone Colbran
Leigh John Parker

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jarrod James Cartledge

For Sentence via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Matthew John Davey

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher John Worker

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Peter Glenn Howlett

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Witnesses

For Trial
Cameron James Riley

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Mark Thomas Wordsworth
DOA
Mitchell John Campbell
David Shaw
Anthony Paul Smith

For Directions Hearing
Jake Mark Pearce
Michael John Benjamin Wells
Leanne Rosemary Coleman
RUB
Nathan Leigh Stebbings
Justin Richard Maynard
MJP
Mark Gordon Bird
Michelle Marree Woolley
Malcolm John Pilgrim
Amanda Louise White
David William Michaelson
Christopher Richard Stevenson
Desiree Simone Evans
Jhye John Webb
Jordyn Jack Webb
Joshua Phillip John King
Jamian Osbourne Burden
Dale Reginald Loone
Michelle Lee Bradley
Matthew Lee Pearce
Xin Wang
Xinyi Li
Douglas James McIntyre
Lesley Carol McIntyre

For Bail Consent
Bal Bahadur Poudel

2:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
MLJ

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
HFR

ZAD

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Brodie Lee Clarke

4:00pm For Sentence via video link to
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jacob Vernon Hardy
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett

Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm For Application to Extend Caveat
Jodie Maree Hood
v
Samuel Vaughan Hood

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Darren Ward Gale
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Belinda Leone Colbran
Leigh John Parker

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jarrod James Cartledge

For Sentence via video link to
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Matthew John Davey
(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Thursday 2 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 91
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 91
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, before Justice Estcourt, a case was heard concerning the sentencing of a defendant. The defendant, Matthew John Davey, faced sentencing after being convicted on criminal charges. The proceedings took place in Court 7 in Salamanca Place, Hobart, with the sentencing hearing conducted via video link from Burnie. The legal issues that the court had to address involved determining the appropriate sentence for the defendant, considering factors such as the nature of the crime, the defendant's background, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The court also needed to ensure that the sentence was consistent with legal precedents and statutory guidelines.

The court's reasoning focused on the gravity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and the impact of the crime on the victims. Justice Estcourt weighed these factors carefully, ensuring that the sentence was both punitive and rehabilitative. The court considered submissions from both the prosecution and the defence, as well as any character references provided. Ultimately, the court determined that an appropriate sentence would serve to deter the defendant and others from committing similar offences, while also providing an opportunity for rehabilitation. The sentence imposed reflected these considerations, balancing the need for justice with the potential for the defendant to reintegrate into society.

The final orders of the court included the imposition of a custodial sentence, with specific details regarding the length of the sentence and any parole conditions. The court also directed that the defendant be credited for any time already served in custody. Additionally, the court made orders for the confiscation of any proceeds derived from the criminal activity. These orders were designed to ensure that the sentence had a meaningful impact and to uphold the principles of justice and deterrence.

Orders