Law Lists For The Supreme Court Of Tasmania Thursday, 2 July 2020HOBARTCourtÂ 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the Court Of Criminal Appeal9:30 a.mFor JudgmentDirector of Public Prosecution v Alexandra Rose...

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 2 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:30 a.m
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecution v Alexandra Rose Kobelke
Court 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For Plea IRB

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
BAC
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jayden Grant Horne
Hayden Kingsley Black

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Application
Branch Loans Pty Ltd v Acutel Property Pty Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Victor Kent Park

For Directions
Emanette Kristin Leedham

For Sentence
Luis Henry Lachlan McRae
Liam Ross Woolley
Derrick Jonathan Clack

For Legal Argument via video link
Heath Lance Chatters

For Bail Consent
Tara Maree Astell

2:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Kaydon Poole

For Pre-recording
Victor Kent Park

4:15pm
For Directions
Hayden Dean Scott Stone

For Directions via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Maree Anne Richardson

For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Shannon Rex Cole
Adon Axel Harding
Dyson Noel Roughley
Zoe Leanne Whiley
Court 7, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m. For Sentence
Troy Daniel Perry

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link
John Maxwell James Tatnell
Jason Clifford Gordon
NLW

10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
JD

11:00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
Dallas John Eaves

For Bail Application
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Jmarli Rex Burgess

For Bail Consent
JKH
Georgia Skrepetos
Wayne James Benjamin

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions HearingMartin Joseph Kent v Rebecca Sandra Reid

Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Associate Justice HOLT
9.15 am
Heath William Leslie Watson v Amanda Jane Ackroyd
Directions hearing – Partition Act 1869

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
From 9:00a.m. to 4:00p.m.
Telephone Directions Hearings
in the Absence of Accused Persons
10:00a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Patrick Andrew Thurley

12:00p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
Codie Ken Fazackerley

4:15p.m.
For Plea
Stephen Clement Burton

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kaydon Poole

4:15pm
For Directions via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Maree Anne Richardson

For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Shannon Rex Cole
Adon Axel Harding
Dyson Noel Roughley
Zoe Leanne Whiley

In the Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania, Alexandra Rose Kobelke appeared before Chief Justice Blow on 2 July 2020. The matter was heard in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart, and involved a judgment regarding a criminal appeal. Kobelke was the appellant, and the Director of Public Prosecutions was the respondent.

The court was required to decide on the appeal against the conviction and sentence imposed on Kobelke, focusing on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and the appropriateness of the sentence. The appeal challenged the trial judge's decision on several grounds, including the admissibility of certain evidence and the application of legal principles in sentencing.

The court examined the evidence presented during the trial and assessed whether it was sufficient to support the conviction beyond reasonable doubt. The court also considered the sentencing process, including whether the sentence imposed was appropriate and whether any errors in the application of legal principles had occurred. The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient, and the sentence was appropriate, and therefore dismissed the appeal.

The court did not make any further orders, and the conviction and sentence remained as originally imposed by the trial judge.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established