Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 2 July 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 780


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 2 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:30 a.m
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecution v Alexandra Rose Kobelke
Court 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For Plea B

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
BAC
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jayden Grant Horne
Hayden Kingsley Black

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Application
Branch Loans Pty Ltd v Acutel Property Pty Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Victor Kent Park

For Directions
Emanette Kristin Leedham

For Sentence
Luis Henry Lachlan McRae
Liam Ross Woolley
Derrick Jonathan Clack

For Legal Argument via video link
Heath Lance Chatters

For Bail Consent
Tara Maree Astell

2:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Kaydon Poole

For Pre-recording
Victor Kent Park

4:15pm
For Directions
Hayden Dean Scott Stone

For Directions via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Maree Anne Richardson

For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Shannon Rex Cole
Adon Axel Harding
Dyson Noel Roughley
Zoe Leanne Whiley
Court 7, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m. For Sentence
Troy Daniel Perry

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link
John Maxwell James Tatnell
Jason Clifford Gordon
NLW

10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
JD

11:00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
Dallas John Eaves

For Bail Application
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Jmarli Rex Burgess

For Bail Consent
JKH
Georgia Skrepetos
Wayne James Benjamin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions HearingMartin Joseph Kent v Rebecca Sandra Reid

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.15 am
Heath William Leslie Watson v Amanda Jane Ackroyd
Directions hearing – Partition Act 1869

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
From 9:00a.m. to 4:00p.m.
Telephone Directions Hearings
in the Absence of Accused Persons
10:00a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Patrick Andrew Thurley

12:00p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
Codie Ken Fazackerley

4:15p.m.
For Plea
Stephen Clement Burton

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Kaydon Poole

4:15pm
For Directions via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Maree Anne Richardson

For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Shannon Rex Cole
Adon Axel Harding
Dyson Noel Roughley
Zoe Leanne Whiley

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 2 July 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 780
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 780
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard various criminal and civil cases on 2 July 2020. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases involved pleas, bail variations, sentencing, and directions hearings. Notable cases included the plea of Victor Kent Park, directions hearings for Jayden Grant Horne and Hayden Kingsley Black, and the sentencing of Luis Henry Lachlan McRae, Liam Ross Woolley, and Derrick Jonathan Clack. In the civil jurisdiction, there was an application from Branch Loans Pty Ltd against Acutel Property Pty Ltd. Additionally, there were multiple directions hearings, bail applications, and consents across different courts and locations, including video link sessions.

The legal issues addressed by the court ranged from procedural matters in both criminal and civil cases to substantive issues such as bail applications and sentencing guidelines. The court had to ensure compliance with procedural fairness, assess the merits of bail applications, and determine appropriate sentences based on the evidence and legal frameworks applicable to each case.

The court's reasoning focused on adherence to legal procedures, the evaluation of evidence, and the application of statutory provisions to each case. In the criminal cases, the court considered the seriousness of the offences, the circumstances of the accused, and the principles of justice in determining sentences and bail conditions. In the civil case, the focus was on the application of property law and the rights and obligations of the parties involved. The outcomes varied, with some cases proceeding to further hearings or trials, while others concluded with sentences or bail variations as appropriate.

The final orders included directions for further hearings, variations in bail conditions, and the imposition of sentences. Specific outcomes for individual cases were documented, reflecting the court's decisions on the matters presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.