LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 16 SEPTEMBER 2021
HOBART
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Joshua Dillon Astell
Adrian Michael Flounders
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ronald Athol Keating
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
QRS
v
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania & Law Society of Tasmania
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
JSF
Damian Leslie Harper
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am
For trial (part-heard)
APA
2.15pm
For bail application
David Ian Coles
Lai Le
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Rixon Eldon Ralph
For Sentencing Submissions
Banjo Manser
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
Helen Margaret TURNER and anor v James Douglas Booth CASHION
For Directions Hearing
Michael EVERUSS v Donna CHANDLER
For Mention
ELDERS COUNCIL OF TASMANIA ABORIGINAL CORPORATION v Robin WEST and anor
9:30a.m. via MS Teams
For Possession
SUNCORP-METWAY LTD v Stuart Michael PACE
2:15p.m.
For Hearing
TPT WEALTH LTD v Fiona Anne CLARK and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Kurt Anthony Lowe
(Part-heard)
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Cecil Maurice Mabb
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 am
For Application to Vary Bail
Andrew Dawson
For Trial
NDT
4:15 pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Cecil Maurice Mabb
4:15 pm
For Hearing
Jake John Sushames
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 310
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court involved a dispute between QRS and the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania and the Law Society of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the text provided. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart. The court was required to decide on the legal issues surrounding the dispute between the parties. The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the text. The final orders of the court were not stated.
The court heard a directions hearing for the matter of QRS v Legal Profession Board of Tasmania & Law Society of Tasmania. The legal issues before the court were not specified in the text provided. The court's reasoning and outcome were not stated. It is possible that the court made orders for further directions or for the parties to provide further information or evidence. The final orders of the court were not stated.
The matter was heard before Justice GEASON in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The court provided directions for the proceedings to continue and set a timetable for the next steps in the case. The specific details of the directions given by the court were not stated.
No further orders were stated in the text provided.
The court heard a directions hearing for the matter of QRS v Legal Profession Board of Tasmania & Law Society of Tasmania. The legal issues before the court were not specified in the text provided. The court's reasoning and outcome were not stated. It is possible that the court made orders for further directions or for the parties to provide further information or evidence. The final orders of the court were not stated.
The matter was heard before Justice GEASON in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The court provided directions for the proceedings to continue and set a timetable for the next steps in the case. The specific details of the directions given by the court were not stated.
No further orders were stated in the text provided.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.