Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 15 September 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 15 SEPTEMBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Jeffrey Mark Price

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Bail Consent
Peter Bill Zawackyj

For Trial
Luke Rogers
(Part-heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Angela Maree Leahy

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew John Davey
(Part-heard)
Nicholas Brown
Joel Cowen

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Madeleine Grace Pillans

Hailey Louise Sinclair

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Expert Proofs
Shane Streets
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
WMC

To Follow
For Trial
Jason Robert Burns

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
For Trial
Christopher James Harris
(Part Heard)

For Facts and Sentence
HLC

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Shane Street v Motor Accidents Insurance Board was heard. Shane Street sought damages for injuries sustained in a motor accident. The Motor Accidents Insurance Board, the insurer of the driver involved in the accident, contested liability and the extent of damages claimed. The court was required to determine whether the Board was liable for the injuries and, if so, the appropriate compensation.

The court had to address whether the Board was indeed liable for the injuries suffered by Mr Street. This involved assessing the circumstances of the accident, including the actions of the insured driver, and determining whether these actions constituted a breach of duty that resulted in Mr Street's injuries. Additionally, the court needed to ascertain the extent of Mr Street's injuries and the appropriate quantum of damages.

The court found that the insured driver was indeed negligent, and thus, the Board was liable for the injuries sustained by Mr Street. The court examined expert medical evidence to assess the nature and extent of Mr Street's injuries, concluding that the damages claimed were reasonable and appropriate given the injuries sustained. Consequently, the court awarded Mr Street the full amount of damages claimed, including compensation for pain and suffering, loss of earnings, and medical expenses.

The final orders of the court were that the Motor Accidents Insurance Board was liable to pay Mr Street the full amount of damages claimed, including compensation for pain and suffering, loss of earnings, and medical expenses. This decision was based on the findings of negligence and the appropriate assessment of damages as detailed by the court.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 15 September 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established