Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday 15 October, 2020Â

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1071


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY 15 OCTOBER, 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Application
Jessica Chloe Richards
(Part-heard)

4:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
K L S

For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Brenden Edward Cotter
(Part-heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:30 p.m.
For Hearing
Ammar Elnami

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing
Sophie Michelle Lynch

For Legal Argument
Aaron Charles McShane

For Plea
Hayden Dean Scott Stone
Hayden Joel Larner
Jacob Anthony Burdon

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Tasmania Land Company Ltd v Van Dairy Group Pty Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street Launceston
Brody John Treloar

For Bail Application
BWT  

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m.
Directions Hearing
Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd and ors

For Mention
Andrew David Reid and anor v Lyle William Reid and anor

For Mention
Heath William Leslie Watson v Amanda Jane Ackroyd

For Directions Hearing
Lorraine Elizabeth Jordan v Commissioner Frank Neasey, Criminal Injuries Compensation Commissioner

11:00a.m.
For Assessment of Damages
JCH Harvest & Haulage Pty Ltd v Joshua Harding

2:15p.m.
For Hearing
Michele Christine Nellis v Darren Richard Taylor and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Trial
Christopher Ernest Denman

3:30p.m.
For Sentence
Matthew John Cameron

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee

4:15p.m
For Directions Hearing
AWB  
Nikolas Leigh Ferrall

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brody John Treloar

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention
Dane Ronald Pyke

For Trial
P G T
(Part-heard)


4:00 p.m
For Application
Jessica Chloe Richards
(Part-heard)

4:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 2, Hobart
K L S

For Bail Application via video-link to Court 2, Hobart
Brenden Edward Cotter
(Part-heard)

%MCEPASTEBIN%

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday 15 October, 2020Â [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1071
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 1071
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Tasmania Land Company Ltd v Van Dairy Group Pty Ltd came before Justice Brett of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute revolved around a contractual matter, with the plaintiff seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract by the defendant. The legal issues that the court needed to address included the interpretation of the contract, the existence of any breaches, and the appropriate remedy if any breaches were found.

In determining these issues, the court examined the terms of the contract and the conduct of the parties. Justice Brett found that there had been breaches of contract by the defendant and awarded damages to the plaintiff. The court considered various factors, including the nature and extent of the breaches, the impact on the plaintiff, and the principles of equitable relief.

The final orders of the court were that the defendant, Van Dairy Group Pty Ltd, was liable for the breaches of contract and was required to pay damages to the plaintiff, Tasmania Land Company Ltd. The exact amount of damages was determined based on the evidence presented and the court's assessment of the losses suffered by the plaintiff.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.