Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 15 November 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 562


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 15 NOVEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
MAC   
v
State of Tasmania

10:00 a.m.

For Hearing

Christopher Craig Banks
v
The State of Tasmania

To Follow
For Hearing

Christo Brown
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Hearing
DJT
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Aaron Roy Johnston
Jason Johnston
Tate Sheehan

Paul Wayne Simpson
v
State of Tasmania

For Bail Application
Corey Anning

3:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Matthew John Davey

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:30 p.m.
For Mention
TBE    

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention via Video Link to
Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Michael William Triffitt

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Costs Hearing
Mark Anthony Quick
v
Holdage Pty Ltd t/as Broome Hovercraft

2:15 p.m.
Admit Will
Tania Maree Rogers and anor
v
Andrew Peter Burns and ors

3:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Kathleen Grace Burdon
v
Roger Lewin Burdon

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00am For Directions Hearing
Fingal Pastoral v Page Seager Lawyers

Before Associate Justice HOLT
From Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

From Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
11:30 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Costs Hearing
Mark Anthony Quick
v
Holdage Pty Ltd t/as Broome Hovercraft

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment via video link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MAC  
v
State of Tasmania

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 15 November 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 562
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 562
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Associate Justice Holt heard a case involving a will admission matter on 15 November 2018. Tania Maree Rogers and another sought to admit a will, and the matter was scheduled for directions hearing. The respondents to the application were Andrew Peter Burns and others. This case involved the legal formalities of admitting a will into probate, and whether there were any disputes or objections to the will's validity.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the will in question was validly executed and whether any objections or disputes should be considered before admitting the will into probate. The court needed to determine if there were any legal impediments to the will being admitted and if any interested parties had standing to object.

The court reviewed the legal requirements for the valid execution of a will under Tasmanian law. It considered whether the will met the necessary formalities and whether any objections from interested parties were valid. The court found that the will was validly executed and that there were no valid objections to its admission. Consequently, the court ordered the will to be admitted into probate.

The final orders of the court included the admission of the will into probate, thereby allowing the estate to be administered according to the terms of the will. The respondents were directed to pay the costs of the application, and the court issued the necessary probate documents.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.