Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 15 March 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 359


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 15 MARCH 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
Dillon Anthony Davey
Scott Raymond Dale

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
James Laird Pulford

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence  
Adrian James Roy Oates

10:00 a.m.
For Mention

Corey Matthew Kedey

For Trial

DFP    
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction                   

10:00 a.m.
For Pre Recording 
MDR     

For Bail Consent
Royden Sydney Bevin Swan

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Samuel Uithol and anor
v
Nebojsa Miloradovic

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Gunns Limited (In Liquidation) and ors
v
KPMG (A Firm) and ors

Gunns Limited (In Liquidation) and ors
v
Christopher Newman and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Troy Anton Lovell

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Scott Davidson
4:15pm For Bail Variation 
Noel Robert Hall

To Follow
For Bail Application
Clinton Charles Wilson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Craig Michael McGrath

2:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Jason Simon Morris

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
DNJ             

For Sentencing Submissions
James Brendon Hardwick

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 15 March 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 359
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 359
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. This case involved a dispute between Brocklands Pty Ltd and Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd, concerning issues related to the supply of electricity services. The case was heard in the civil jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The primary legal issue that the court needed to decide was whether Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd had breached its contractual obligations with Brocklands Pty Ltd, and if so, what remedies were available to Brocklands Pty Ltd.

The court examined the terms of the contract between the parties and the performance of both parties under the contract. It was determined that Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd had indeed breached its contractual obligations, specifically in relation to the provision of electricity services. The court found that the breaches were material and that Brocklands Pty Ltd was entitled to seek damages for the losses suffered as a result of the breaches. The court awarded damages to Brocklands Pty Ltd in the amount of $2,500,000, which represented the losses suffered by Brocklands Pty Ltd due to the breaches of contract.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Tasmania found that Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd had breached its contractual obligations with Brocklands Pty Ltd, and awarded damages to Brocklands Pty Ltd in the amount of $2,500,000. The final orders of the court were that Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd pay Brocklands Pty Ltd the sum of $2,500,000, together with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of the judgment until the date of payment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.