Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 12 April 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 12 APRIL 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Philip Thomas Burns
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Scott Andrew Cripps

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

KKB

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings
Gary Matthews
Kylie Jane Hack
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
KKB

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Philip Thomas Burns has filed an appeal against the State of Tasmania in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, seeking a review of his criminal conviction and sentence. The case was heard before Justice Wood in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The central legal issue before the court was whether the lower court's findings were supported by the evidence presented, and if the sentence was appropriate given the circumstances of the case. The court examined the evidence and the legal principles applicable to the case to determine if the appeal had merit.

Justice Wood meticulously reviewed the proceedings of the lower court, focusing on the evidence presented and the legal standards applied. The court considered whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and whether the sentence imposed was commensurate with the offence. The court also assessed the arguments put forward by both parties regarding the application of legal principles to the facts of the case. After thorough deliberation, Justice Wood concluded that the appeal was not substantiated, affirming the lower court's decision and dismissing the appeal.

The court's decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the evidence and the applicable legal standards. The judgment articulated that the lower court's findings were well-supported by the evidence, and the sentence was deemed appropriate. The appeal was thus dismissed, and the original conviction and sentence were upheld. This outcome reflects the court's commitment to ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the law and the facts of each case.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 12 April 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established