LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 10 JUNE MAY 2021
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Bail Application via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Hobart Reception Prison
Alex Large
(Part-Heard)
3:30pm
For Bail Application via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Ashley Youth Detention Centre
JKW
For Bail Application via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Isaac Jess Hall
PWR, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kyam Keith Broadby
Court 7, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For trial (part-heard)
Kenneth John Bailey
Rodney Jeffrey Bailey
4:00pm
For sentence
Dillon Robert Mitchell
4:30pm
For Bail Application by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
James Anthony Duggan
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via Teams
For Directions Hearing
Thomas Marthinus SMALBERGER as Executor of the Estate of the Late Keith William ALDOUS, Deceased v Basil George LEWIS & ANOR
For Directions Hearing
Robert Francis MCMAHON and anor v THE STATE OF TASMANIA
For Directions Hearing
ADVANCED RURAL HEALTH PTY LTD v Olga GOLOVKO
9:30a.m. via Teams
For Possession
SUNCORP-METWAY LTD v Stuart Michael PACE
For Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Elizabeth Joan VOORHAM
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
BJHC
(part-heard)
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
SDH For Application for Bail
Paul Smyth
For Directions Hearing via video link to Launceston Reception Prison and PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kyam Keith Broadby
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Bail Application via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Isaac Jess Hall
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via Teams
For Directions Hearing
Thomas Marthinus SMALBERGER as Executor of the Estate of the Late Keith William ALDOUS, Deceased v Basil George LEWIS & ANOR
For Directions Hearing
Robert Francis MCMAHON and anor v THE STATE OF TASMANIA
For Directions Hearing
ADVANCED RURAL HEALTH PTY LTD v Olga GOLOVKO
9:30a.m. via Teams
For Possession
SUNCORP-METWAY LTD v Stuart Michael PACE
For Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Elizabeth Joan VOORHAM
BURNIE
Conference Room, Alexander Street, BurnieBefore Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
SDH
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
TLR
(Part-Heard)
11:00am
For Mention
Mark Bruce Whitney
2:15pm
For Bail Application via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Hobart Reception Prison
Alex Large
(Part-Heard)
3:30pm
For Bail Application
JKW
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Francesco Antonio Ciampa
For Bail Application via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Isaac Jess Hall
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 180
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Alex Large was heard before Justice Brett in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, involving a bail application. The nature of the dispute was related to the release of the applicant on bail while awaiting trial. The applicant, Alex Large, was in custody and had applied for bail to be granted by the court. The legal issues that the court had to decide were whether the applicant was eligible for bail and, if so, under what conditions the bail could be granted. The court considered the principles of bail, the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court, and the risk of the applicant reoffending or interfering with witnesses or the course of justice.
The court examined the evidence presented by the prosecution and the defence and considered the arguments made by both parties. The court found that the applicant was eligible for bail, subject to certain conditions. The court considered the seriousness of the charges against the applicant and the risk of reoffending, but also noted the applicant's lack of a criminal record and the support available to him if granted bail. The court considered the need to protect the community and the risk of the applicant interfering with witnesses or the course of justice, but ultimately determined that the applicant was not a significant flight risk or danger to the community. The court also took into account the applicant's ties to the community and his employment history.
The court granted bail to the applicant subject to certain conditions, including a requirement to report to a bail supervisor, a curfew, and restrictions on travel. The court also ordered the applicant to surrender his passport and to refrain from contacting certain witnesses. The court emphasized the importance of the applicant's compliance with the bail conditions and warned that any breach of the conditions could result in the cancellation of bail and the applicant's re-arrest. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and the principles of bail, and the outcome was that the applicant was granted bail subject to conditions.
The court examined the evidence presented by the prosecution and the defence and considered the arguments made by both parties. The court found that the applicant was eligible for bail, subject to certain conditions. The court considered the seriousness of the charges against the applicant and the risk of reoffending, but also noted the applicant's lack of a criminal record and the support available to him if granted bail. The court considered the need to protect the community and the risk of the applicant interfering with witnesses or the course of justice, but ultimately determined that the applicant was not a significant flight risk or danger to the community. The court also took into account the applicant's ties to the community and his employment history.
The court granted bail to the applicant subject to certain conditions, including a requirement to report to a bail supervisor, a curfew, and restrictions on travel. The court also ordered the applicant to surrender his passport and to refrain from contacting certain witnesses. The court emphasized the importance of the applicant's compliance with the bail conditions and warned that any breach of the conditions could result in the cancellation of bail and the applicant's re-arrest. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and the principles of bail, and the outcome was that the applicant was granted bail subject to conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.