Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 1 September 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 1 SEPTEMBER 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Lucas William Gatehouse
Blake Cameron McPherson
Kyam Keith Broadby
Luke Rogers

For Trial
Curtis Patrick Robert Clay
(Part Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Wayne Gregory Pattison

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Duc Van Nguyen

For Trial
Angela Maree Leahy
(Part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Bowden Kemp

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Andrew John Bowles v Motor Accidents Insurance Board

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Consent
Luke James Reader

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Thomas James Aliano

4:15pm For Bail Application
Benjamin John Griffiths

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Pre-Recording

Christopher James Harris

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of cases on Thursday, 1 September 2016. The cases ranged from bail applications and mentions to part-heard trials and directions hearings. In the Hobart court, there were mentions for four individuals, and a part-heard trial for Curtis Patrick Robert Clay. Another trial was scheduled for the Launceston court, with Andrew John Bowles suing the Motor Accidents Insurance Board. A bail application was heard for Benjamin John Griffiths in Burnie.

The legal issues before the court varied depending on the nature of the case. In the case of the trial between Bowles and the Motor Accidents Insurance Board, the central issue was likely related to the validity of the claim made by Bowles against the Board. In the criminal cases, the issues ranged from the granting of bail to the continuation of ongoing trials. The court had to consider the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both sides, and the applicable laws to make its decisions.

The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were not detailed in the provided list. Each case would have been addressed according to its specific circumstances and the evidence presented. The court would have applied relevant legal principles and statutes to arrive at its decisions. The outcomes could include the continuation of trials, the granting or denial of bail, or the scheduling of further hearings. The final orders for each case would have been recorded in the court's official records.

Additionally, the law lists provided information on magistrate court lists and how to request email subscriptions for other courts. This indicates the comprehensive nature of the court's operations and the accessibility of information for legal practitioners and the public.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 1 September 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established