LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 9 NOVEMBER 2020
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the FULL COURT11:00 a.m.For HearingState of Tasmania
v
MFC
Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCivil Jurisdiction4:00 p.m.For JudgmentTT-Line Company Pty Ltd
v
Rae Burrows
Criminal Jurisdiction4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie;PWR, Griffith Street, Devonport and Risdon Prison Complex Jarrad Christian Robaard
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Tye Paul Silver
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Shaun Brodie Parremore
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Justin Kevin Pearce
Joshua Dillon Astell
John Maxwell James Tatnell
Jmarli Rex Burgess
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
George Douglas Smith
David Hau Moeakiola
Martin Gerard Quigley
For Directions Hearing via video link To Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Amber Jessica Royer
Amanda Louise White
For Directions Hearing via video link To Hobart Reception Prison
Joshua Robin Oakley
For First Directions David Jeffrey Burridge
For Directions Hearing
JDTony Matthew White
Talisha Renee Kelly-Narracott
Arron Roots
James Harold Coomer
Sharni Marie Downey
Joel Peter Young
Jorden Bird
Timothy Albert Evans
Steven Craig Fielding
Jack Andrew Cole
Adrian Michael Flounders
Kenneth John Bailey
Shane Christopher Hardman
David Andrew Thomas
RHK
Kevin John Clancy
Belinda Elizabeth Dobson
Richard Gordon Dickenson
For Bail Consent
Mark William Ransley
James Christopher Steven FlaskasKenneth ShawYohannes Tesfasilassie Tsegazeab
Hossein KarimiMohammad Maleki
Mohammad Heidari
Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe
Daniel James Crisp
Michael Peter Lee James Blake
Andrew Brett Bell
James Mathew Johnson
Tyler Anthony James Causon
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Stephen John Hunt
Todd Athol Jackson
Wayne James Benjamin
Rebecca Maree Jones
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
PJS
Kye Douglas Glenn Palmer
Trent Scott Henricks
MJRBJWBJohn Charles Reardon
2:15p.m
For Bail Application
Vincent Di Stefano
4:15p.m
For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video link to
Launceston, Court 2, Cameron Street
Patrick Simon Bailey
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
Aaron Dean Eaves
Bobby Gene Jacobson
Shaun Edward Hodges (awaiting bail consent letter)
11:00am
For Directions Hearing
Dallas John Eaves
11:00am
For Trial
Aaron Charles McShane
11:30am
For Trial
Geoffrey Paul Bennett-Scrimshaw
(Part-heard)
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
The Queen v Cassandra Helene Murray
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Aaron Pearson
For Bail Application via video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Christopher John Howard
Court 7, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
3:00p.m. via Skype
For Directions Hearing
Michael Daniel Neal v Terrence Anthony Neal
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
via video link from Hobart, Court 8, Salamanca Place
Patrick Simon BaileyCourt 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Clifford Nas
BURNIE
PWR, Alexander Street, BurnieBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart; PWR, Griffith Street, Devonport and Risdon Prison ComplexJarrad Christian Robaard
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1106
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the State of Tasmania was involved in a legal dispute against MFC. The case was heard in Hobart before the Full Court. The primary issue before the court was to determine whether MFC was legally entitled to the relief sought in the proceedings against the State of Tasmania. The court had to consider the relevant legal principles and precedents to resolve this matter.
The court's reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the applicable law and the facts of the case. It examined the arguments presented by both parties and assessed their legal merits. The court also considered the implications of any relevant statutory provisions or case law. Ultimately, the court concluded that MFC's claim was not supported by the law and was therefore dismissed.
The final orders of the court were that MFC's claim against the State of Tasmania was dismissed, with each party to bear their own costs of the proceedings. This decision was based on the court's determination that MFC was not legally entitled to the relief sought.
The court's reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the applicable law and the facts of the case. It examined the arguments presented by both parties and assessed their legal merits. The court also considered the implications of any relevant statutory provisions or case law. Ultimately, the court concluded that MFC's claim was not supported by the law and was therefore dismissed.
The final orders of the court were that MFC's claim against the State of Tasmania was dismissed, with each party to bear their own costs of the proceedings. This decision was based on the court's determination that MFC was not legally entitled to the relief sought.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.